2010
DOI: 10.1007/s10841-010-9267-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can hay harvesting detrimentally affect adult butterfly abundance?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
37
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The negative impact of mowing on butterfly abundance has been pointed out in previous studies (e.g. Dover et al 2010). A more striking finding in the present study was the scale of the impact on the scarce copper.…”
Section: Habitat Requirementssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The negative impact of mowing on butterfly abundance has been pointed out in previous studies (e.g. Dover et al 2010). A more striking finding in the present study was the scale of the impact on the scarce copper.…”
Section: Habitat Requirementssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Due to individualistic (Bourn & Thomas 2002) and often not precisely known species requirements, it is impossible to design a cutting strategy that would perfectly suit all species present at each site. As convincingly argued by Dennis et al (2003Dennis et al ( , 2010, and others (e.g., Vanreusel & Van Dyck 2007), the components of arthropod habitats, including larval and adult food, shelter, roosting and mating sites, etc., may occur disjunctly in time and space. In terms of ecosystem dynamics, the coexistence of diverse species assemblages results from interplays of patchily occurring disturbances followed by succession (Wu & Loucks 1995), to which species adapt via dynamic metapopulation processes (Aviron et al 2007).…”
Section: Conservation Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Whereas a majority of plants growing at seminatural grassland will, by default, regenerate after hay cutting or grazing (e.g., Hegland et al 2001;Bissels et al 2004; but see Kohler et al 2005), populations of specialised and relatively sedentary animals, including insects, may be negatively affected. Export of biomass depletes insect of food and shelter (Morris 2000;Kruess & Tscharntke 2002;Huntzinger et al 2008) and directly kills individuals (Schtickzelle et al 2007;Dover et al 2010;Humbert et al 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the twentieth century, mechanisation in both agriculture and forestry brought the era of intensive land use (Young et al 2005;Wrbka et al 2008;Korösi et al 2014), and the traditional land use practices were no longer economically viable (Konvicka et al 2005;Henle et al 2008). Consequently, the land became either intensively used or abandoned, which led to population declines in numerous butterfly species (Dover et al 2010;Horák et al 2013;Loos et al 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These principles involve (i) relatively low mowing intensity, with a single fragment being mown no more than once per year, and (ii) mowing different fragments at different times in order to ensure heterogeneous turf height within meadows (Morris 2000). A higher mowing frequency may be beneficial for xerophilous species, which prefer short vegetation, e.g., (2007); (41) Kolev (2003); (42) Kolev (2005); (43) Konvička and Kuras (1999); (44) Konvička et al (2005); (45) Konvička et al (2008a); (46) Konvička et al (2008b); (47) Konvička et al (2014); (48) Korb (1994); (49) Kozlov and Kullberg (2008); (50) Kudrna et al (2015); (51) Kuras et al (2003); (52) Leigheb et al (1998); (53) Lelo and Spasojević (2012); (54) Lelo (2000); (55) Mowing should optimally take place outside the flight periods of target butterfly species so as to maintain high availability of nectar sources for their imagoes, and a sufficient number of host plants for oviposition (Johst et al 2006;Mládek et al 2006;Dover et al 2010;Wynhoff et al 2011). This may be a serious limitation if several target ( Wynhoff et al (2011) species occur sympatrically at the same site, which is frequently the case with Maculinea butterflies (Sliwinska et al 2006).…”
Section: Favourable Management Rotational Mowingmentioning
confidence: 99%