Proceedings of the 51st Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences 2018
DOI: 10.24251/hicss.2018.133
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can Humanoid Service Robots Perform Better Than Service Employees? A Comparison of Innovative Behavior Cues

Abstract: Abstract

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
32
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, it is important that service robots deliver on those elements according to customer needs and wants, and it is this needs congruency (c.f., Wirtz and Mattila, 2001) and role congruency (c.f., Soloman et al, 1985) that drive acceptance rather than a high or low level on those elements. The service process tends to break down when there is a service failure; recovery is unlikely within the technology Can recover the service by offering alternative solutions very much like a service employee could Social-emotional dimensions Stock and Merkle (2018) argue that customers' acceptance of robots will not only depend on their perceived functionality but also on social-emotional elements (see also Heerink et al, 2008;van Doorn et al, 2017) such as perceived humanness (Tinwell et al, 2011), perceived social interactivity and perceived social presence (van Doorn et al, 2017). Each of the three sub-dimensions will be discussed below.…”
Section: Functional Dimensions and Self-service Technology (Sst)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it is important that service robots deliver on those elements according to customer needs and wants, and it is this needs congruency (c.f., Wirtz and Mattila, 2001) and role congruency (c.f., Soloman et al, 1985) that drive acceptance rather than a high or low level on those elements. The service process tends to break down when there is a service failure; recovery is unlikely within the technology Can recover the service by offering alternative solutions very much like a service employee could Social-emotional dimensions Stock and Merkle (2018) argue that customers' acceptance of robots will not only depend on their perceived functionality but also on social-emotional elements (see also Heerink et al, 2008;van Doorn et al, 2017) such as perceived humanness (Tinwell et al, 2011), perceived social interactivity and perceived social presence (van Doorn et al, 2017). Each of the three sub-dimensions will be discussed below.…”
Section: Functional Dimensions and Self-service Technology (Sst)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accomplishing such objectives forces organizations to focus on service innovation, which appears when a service provider develops, promotes, and puts new ideas into practice as key ingredients of innovative services or work behaviors [2]. A service representative providing new solutions and creating novel ideas for customers is known as "service innovative behavior" (SIB) [3], which has emerged as an essential target in a range of organizations [4,5]. It is especially true for the hotel industry, in which managers have started examining creative ways to attract and keep their customers through supporting the novel ideas of their employees regarding hospitality processes and services [6][7][8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To run the experiments in a setting as realistic as possible, the setting of a hotel reception was built up that resembles a realistic hotel situation, which was guided by the design of established experimental studies [31] [32].…”
Section: Experimental Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%