Can Hydropower Still Be Considered a Clean Energy Source? Compelling Evidence from a Middle-Sized Hydropower Station in China

Abstract

The development of clean energy is of great importance in alleviating both the energy crisis and environmental pollution resulting from rapid global economic growth. Hydroelectric generation is considered climate benign, as it neither requires fossil carbon to produce energy nor emits large amounts of greenhouse gases (GHG), unlike conventional energy generation techniques such as coal and oil power plants. However, dams and their associated reservoirs are not entirely GHG-neutral and their classification as a clean source of energy requires further investigation. This study evaluated the environmental impact of the Xiajiang hydropower station based on life cycle assessment (LCA) according to the 2006 Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) guidelines, focusing specifically on GHG emissions after the submersion of the reservoir. Results reveal that although hydropower is not as clean as we thought, it is still an absolute “low emissions” power type in China. The amount of GHG emissions produced by this station is 3.72 million tons with an emissions coefficient of 32.63 g CO2eq/kWh. This figure is lower than that of thermal power, thus implying that hydropower is still a clean energy resource in China. Our recommendations to further minimize the environmental impacts of this station are the optimization of relevant structural designs, the utilization of new and improved construction materials, and the extension of farmland lifting technology.

Water, Energy and Carbon Tradeoffs of Groundwater Irrigation-Based Food Production: Case Studies from Fergana Valley, Central Asia

“…There are also environmental and social considerations in prioritizing hydropower while infringing the needs of other uses, such as the environment and agriculture [70][71][72][73]. Therefore, hydropower development must ensure environmental flows, with high importance for river ecosystem services.…”

Which Is More Environmentally Friendly? A Comparative Analysis of the Environmental Benefits of Two Waste-to-Energy Technologies for Plastics Based on an LCA Model

“…There is no waste plastic treatment process in the construction phase; the material flow in the construction phase was converted into each functional unit according to the equipment service life [30]. In this study, the decommissioning phase results were not considered in the analysis because of the relatively small material input and output and insignificant results [31].…”

Distributed Generation: A Review on Current Energy Status, Grid-Interconnected PQ Issues, and Implementation Constraints of DG in Malaysia

“…Currently, Malaysia has only acquired 2% of the energy harnessed from the total energy mix on renewables, which is shown in Figure 2. The acquired percentage of renewable excludes a large hydro generation capacity of more than 100 MW considering some of its negative impacts towards the environment [35]. Despite this, the Malaysian government aims to achieve a target of up to 20% in the year 2025, which amounts to 4000 MW from the current RE generation [14,36].…”

“…Renewable energy may be a huge trend in the present, but due to the low generation capacity of RE sources, the question remains on the capability of RE in phasing out the existing fossil fuels in the next few years. The authors of [35] predict that the demand of renewable energy could exceed more than a trillion watts in the upcoming five years. The over demand of renewable sources is identified and has been concluded through several key factors on its driving potential in replacing fossil fuels, environmental impacts, and positive economic growth of a country [2,15,32].…”