2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.eja.2008.01.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can mineral and organic fertilization help sequestrate carbon dioxide in cropland?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

6
91
1
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 162 publications
(100 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
6
91
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In the case of nitrogen, a higher content of sand fraction has negative influence, mainly to the labile components, because the probability of their binding to the mineral portion of the soil is lower, resulting in lower their physical stabilization. The less stabilized organic matter is, the faster is nitrogen released (Triberti et al, 2008). The result will be also a lower content of labile nitrogen.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the case of nitrogen, a higher content of sand fraction has negative influence, mainly to the labile components, because the probability of their binding to the mineral portion of the soil is lower, resulting in lower their physical stabilization. The less stabilized organic matter is, the faster is nitrogen released (Triberti et al, 2008). The result will be also a lower content of labile nitrogen.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Haplic Luvisol, the stability of organic substances is lower, therefore, the nitrogen will release faster. Subsequently, the nitrogen can be adsorbed by the roots, or quickly lost through the processes of denitrification, volatilization (Triberti et al, 2008), and nitrification (Stevenson, 1986).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A significant part of the organic carbon is associated with the stable fraction of organic matter and it has been turned over thousands of times over the years (Semenov et al 2013). The content of N t decreased in the following order: FYM > G+NPK3 > G+NPK1 > G. The nitrogen soil content was strictly related to C org and varied more in response to organic material supply than to mineral N rates or to the kind of N fertiliser (Triberti et al 2008), however, in our case C org contents did not correlate with N t in all treatments of fertilisation (FYM: r = 0.492, P > 0.05, n = 8; G+NPK3: r = 0.032, P > 0.05, n = 8; G+NPK1: r = 0.279, P > 0.05, n = 8). C org and N t contents varied by the addition of fertilisation, but without statistical significance (Table 2).…”
Section: T a B L Ementioning
confidence: 95%
“…The use of organic manure caused the fastest build up of the N in the soil, followed by crop residues (in our case grass biomass). These Different letters between lines (a, b) indicate that treatment means are significantly different at P ≤ 0.05 according to LSD multiple-range test G -control; FYM -farmyard manure; G+NPK3 -doses of NPK fertilisers in 3 rd intensity for vineyards; G+NPK1 -doses of NPK fertilisers in 1 st intensity for vineyards; C org -soil organic carbon content; N t -total nitrogen content; P -available phosphorus; K -available potassium effects can be explained by the fact that the lower the stabilisation of organic matter (crop residues < manure), the higher the nitrogen release (Triberti et al 2008). Opposite situations have been recorded (Table 3).…”
Section: T a B L Ementioning
confidence: 99%
“…All forms of N fixation contribute to N pollution of the biosphere, a planetary boundary which is being dangerously exceeded (Rockström et al 2009). It seems that systems using organic fertilisers are less N efficient and result in increased N pollution than synthetic fertiliser which can more precisely target plant needs (Triberti et al 2008). Figure 26 Habitat is lost when cropland expands.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%