2021
DOI: 10.1353/anq.2021.0013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can Oil Speak? On the Production of Ontological Difference and Ambivalence in Extractive Encounters

Abstract: The version in the Kent Academic Repository may differ from the final published version. Users are advised to check http://kar.kent.ac.uk for the status of the paper. Users should always cite the published version of record.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A coupled-human-nature system framework thus examines the interaction and feedback loop between natural and human systems governance. This framework has caused us to think, along with many others, that humanity is part of the ontological totality including the environment (Bovensiepen, 2021;Hornborg, 2015Hornborg, , 2019. This implies that mining activities and climate change mediated by power asymmetries have an environmental impact, which reshapes the socioecological systems.…”
Section: Literature Reviewsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A coupled-human-nature system framework thus examines the interaction and feedback loop between natural and human systems governance. This framework has caused us to think, along with many others, that humanity is part of the ontological totality including the environment (Bovensiepen, 2021;Hornborg, 2015Hornborg, , 2019. This implies that mining activities and climate change mediated by power asymmetries have an environmental impact, which reshapes the socioecological systems.…”
Section: Literature Reviewsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Creative motivation and expression became yoked to economic control when the first cultural village was established. Similarly, Bovensiepen (2020) writes about how the advent of resource extraction among rural people in Timor-Leste's south coast produced the articulation of clear-cut (solid) positions between animism and naturalism, displacing previous more ambivalent (liquid) relations with the inhabited environment. 16 16 Countless other examples exist; e.g.…”
Section: Working With Solidity and Liquidity In Regulatory Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this article, I bring anthropological research on the ontologies of climate (Farbotko 2017; Klepp 2018; Schnegg 2021) and resource extractivism (Bovensiepen 2021; Jacka 2015) into conversation with scholarship on refugee subjectivities (Cabot 2013; Häkli, Pascucci, and Pauliina Kallio 2017; Malkki 1995; Masquelier 2006). I show how experiences of environmental changes are inflected by different forms of extractivism—in particular, what I term refugee extractivism (Morris 2019, 2021b).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%