“…Among the 69 studies that examined links between preparation for bias and youth adjustment, many reported null associations (e.g., Atkin et al, ; Else‐Quest & Morse, ; Ferrari, Ranieri, Barni, & Rosnati, ; French & Coleman, ; Tran & Lee, ), a few reported both positive and negative effects (e.g., Kyere & Huguley, ), and a few found preparation for bias to be associated with increased risk (e.g., Daga & Raval, ; van Bergen, Ersanilli, Pels, & De Ruyter, ). In terms of risk, some studies found that preparation for bias directly predicted greater maladjustment such as higher depressive symptoms (e.g., Liu & Lau, ; Nelson et al, ), whereas other studies found that it exacerbated the negative effect of stressors on adjustment (e.g., Banerjee, Rowley, & Johnson, ; Dotterer & James, ). In contrast, other studies found preparation for bias to be promotive for youth either because it was directly associated with indicators of positive youth outcomes (e.g., D'hondt, Eccles, Van Houtte, & Stevens, ; Joseph & Hunter, ; Sanchez, Smith, & Adams, ), it reduced the negative effects of risk on youth adjustment (e.g., Schires et al, ), or it enhanced the positive effects of other promotive factors on youth adjustment (e.g., Tran & Lee, ).…”