2023
DOI: 10.1080/1331677x.2022.2164323
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can place-based policies reduce urban-rural income inequality? Evidence from China’s Old Revolutionary Development Program based on county-level data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to assess inequality, the Gini coe cient was utilized, speci cally calculated using disposable income. This choice aligns with previous research, such as [41], which recognizes disposable income as a consistent and appropriate indicator. The study also incorporated a range of economic indicators gathered from different datasets.…”
Section: Description Of Study Variables and Datasupporting
confidence: 64%
“…In order to assess inequality, the Gini coe cient was utilized, speci cally calculated using disposable income. This choice aligns with previous research, such as [41], which recognizes disposable income as a consistent and appropriate indicator. The study also incorporated a range of economic indicators gathered from different datasets.…”
Section: Description Of Study Variables and Datasupporting
confidence: 64%
“…The lower-income groups are predominantly located in rural areas, 2 of 19 especially in less prosperous regions known as Outlying Rural Areas (ORAs). Increasing the income of farmers in ORAs and reducing regional income disparities among farmers constitute pivotal steps towards realizing CP in rural areas [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%