2023
DOI: 10.5840/soctheorpract202221151
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can Rawlsian Containment of Hateful Viewpoints Be Effective?

Abstract: While most of the literature has attempted to justify harsh and soft containment given some fundamental commitments of political liberalism, I focus on how justified forms of containment can in themselves be deemed effective. This article shows that a reading of Rawls allows for a comparison of different containment practices based on their capacity to protect the stability of liberal democracies under serious threat. And, in making it possible to compare harsh and soft containment, I evaluate immediate stabil… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 19 publications
(34 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In identifying such proxies, we must ensure that our measurements remain connected to our underlying interests. Proxies must track something that is really linked to the relevant harms, and the relation should not be posited based on pure conjecture (Fumagalli, 2022).…”
Section: Conceptualizing and Assessing Efficacymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In identifying such proxies, we must ensure that our measurements remain connected to our underlying interests. Proxies must track something that is really linked to the relevant harms, and the relation should not be posited based on pure conjecture (Fumagalli, 2022).…”
Section: Conceptualizing and Assessing Efficacymentioning
confidence: 99%