2013
DOI: 10.1080/03033910.2012.737758
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can social intelligence be measured? Psychometric properties of the Tromsø Social Intelligence Scale – English Version

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
30
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
5
30
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The internal consistency of the HEXACO factors ranged from .73 to .77. The TSIS means were comparable to Study 1 means and approximate the values found in other studies (Grieve & Mahar, 2013;Silvera et al, 2001).…”
Section: Descriptive Statistics and Data Screeningsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The internal consistency of the HEXACO factors ranged from .73 to .77. The TSIS means were comparable to Study 1 means and approximate the values found in other studies (Grieve & Mahar, 2013;Silvera et al, 2001).…”
Section: Descriptive Statistics and Data Screeningsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Table 3 provides descriptive statistics and internal consistencies for the HEXACO, TSIS, and SOI-R measures. The TSIS factors showed comparable means as previous studies using male samples (Grieve & Mahar, 2013;Silvera et al, 2001) and the internal consistencies as well, except Social Awareness, which was low. The SOI-R means were higher than what has been reported elsewhere in normative samples for males (Penke & Asendorpf, 2008).…”
Section: Descriptive Statistics and Data Screeningsupporting
confidence: 80%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…According to this line of theorizing, it has been found that emotion understanding correlates with several social competencies: problem solving strategies in conflict within close relationships and friendships (Lopes et al, 2004;Song et al, 2010;Stolarski, Postek & Śmieja, 2011), coping strategies in school environment (MacCann, Fogarty, Zeidner & Roberts, 2011), empathy (Ciarrochi, Chan & Caputi, 2001), providing social support (Lopes, Brackett, Nezlek, Schütz, Sellin & Salovey, 2004;Song et al, 2010), impression management (Lopes et al, 2004), perspective taking (Schröder-Abé & Schütz, 2011), social intelligence (namely social awareness, social information processing and social skills; Grieve & Mahar, 2013), shyness, cooperation, self-confidence and leadership (Gil-Olarte, Palomera & Brackett, 2006). Much of this research has also shown that the above-mentioned social competencies (empathy, coping strategies, conflict resolution strategies, social support) mediate the relations between emotional abilities (e.g.…”
Section: Emotion Understanding and Interpersonal Competenciesmentioning
confidence: 99%