2020
DOI: 10.3390/w12020393
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can Soil Hydraulic Parameters be Estimated from the Stable Isotope Composition of Pore Water from a Single Soil Profile?

Abstract: Modeling water and solute transport in the vadose zone for groundwater resource management requires an accurate determination of soil hydraulic parameters. Estimating these parameters by inverse modeling using in situ observations is very common. However, little attention has been given to the potential of pore water isotope information to parameterize soil water transport models. By conducting a Morris and Sobol sensitivity analysis, we highlight the interest of combining water content and pore water isotope … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, values for the Mualem–van Genuchten parameters α and n obtained for the three permeability classes differ greatly (Table 6). These two parameters were identified as the being most influential parameters in the sensitivity analysis previously carried out for the model (Mattei et al., 2020). Only a slight modification of these two parameters could lead to very different infiltration profiles.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, values for the Mualem–van Genuchten parameters α and n obtained for the three permeability classes differ greatly (Table 6). These two parameters were identified as the being most influential parameters in the sensitivity analysis previously carried out for the model (Mattei et al., 2020). Only a slight modification of these two parameters could lead to very different infiltration profiles.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thirteen parameters (i.e. α 1 , n 1 , S min1 , S max1 , K r1 , F 1 , α 2 , n 2 , S min2 , S max2 , K r2 , F 2 , and λ) were therefore calibrated for each study site to describe their soil hydraulic and transport properties, according to Mattei et al., 2020.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…By applying the quantile deviation l as a new measure of sensitivity, contrast Q indices defined by Fort [63] can be rewritten in a new form; see Equations (8)- (12). By substituting l with l 2 , Q indices can be rewritten as the new K indices, which are based on the decomposition of l 2 , similarly to the way Sobol indices are based on the decomposition of variance; see Equations (13)- (17).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Variance-based SA (generally called Sobol SA) introduces uncertainty as variance and decomposes the variance of the output of the model or system into portions that can be attributed to inputs or sets of inputs [2,3]. Sobol SA is very popular; the principles of the method are often mentioned [4][5][6][7][8] and many articles have applied Sobol SA in their research [9][10][11][12][13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%