2012
DOI: 10.1088/0953-8984/24/17/171001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can spin-polarized photoemission measure spin properties in condensed matter?

Abstract: Photoemitted electrons move in a vacuum; their quantum state can be completely characterized in terms of energy, momentum and spin polarization by spin-polarized photoemission experiments. A review article in this issue by Heinzmann and Dil (2012 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 24 173001) considers whether the measured spin properties, i.e. the magnitude and direction of the spin polarization vector, can be traced back to the quantum state from which these electrons originate. The careful conclusion is that they can… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note in particular that, for each of 6 the subband branches, P x is compatible between all the data sets, which furthermore show systematically the opposite non-trivial spin-winding textures for the inner and outer light bands. These results prove that the helical spin structure, the giant spin splitting, and the subband spin polarization reported in this work, are all independent of the photon energy and polarization, hence inherent to the electronic structure of the 2DEG at the surface of SrTiO 3 [20]. On the other hand, contrary to P x , which does not change with photon energy or polarization, the out-of-plane component (P z ) of the spin polarization for the inner subband presents an anomaly (it gets inverted) at hν = 52 eV.…”
supporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Note in particular that, for each of 6 the subband branches, P x is compatible between all the data sets, which furthermore show systematically the opposite non-trivial spin-winding textures for the inner and outer light bands. These results prove that the helical spin structure, the giant spin splitting, and the subband spin polarization reported in this work, are all independent of the photon energy and polarization, hence inherent to the electronic structure of the 2DEG at the surface of SrTiO 3 [20]. On the other hand, contrary to P x , which does not change with photon energy or polarization, the out-of-plane component (P z ) of the spin polarization for the inner subband presents an anomaly (it gets inverted) at hν = 52 eV.…”
supporting
confidence: 80%
“…This means that the detected free electrons photo-emitted from the surface, whose spin polarization is well defined, have all spins essentially oriented along the same direction, tangential to the Fermi surface. These measured spin-splitting and polarizations are robust with respect to changes in photon energy and polarization (see below and Supplementary Note 3), supporting the interpretation as an intrinsic spin structure of the light subbands [20].…”
supporting
confidence: 67%
“…Thus, the DA30-L spin spectrometer enables analysis of the 3D spin vector of photoelectrons emitted in the acceptance cone of (θ x × θ y ) = (30° × 24°) without sample rotation. Note, however, that, in general, the spin-polarization signal can be complicated by matrix element effects [161][162][163] . Thus, photon-energy-dependent and photon-polarizationdependent spin-resolved ARPES measurements are needed to check whether the spin signal is intrinsic to the magnetic moment of the photoelectrons 45,46 .…”
Section: Spin-resolved Arpesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The additional information on spin polarization can be obtained through spin-resolved ARPES (SARPES) [31,32,33] as has been shown for topological surface states in topological insulators [34,35,36]. There has been only a few SARPES studies on MX 2 [37,38,39] despite the large interest on the material class, mainly due to the difficulty in preparing large area samples suitable for measurements in ultra-high vacuum environment, as current SARPES setups at the synchrotron source are bound to large beam spot size to allow maximum photon flux.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%