Can the Bone Density Estimated by CBCT Predict the Primary Stability of Dental Implants? A New Measurement Protocol

Al-Jamal, Mustafa Faisal J; Al‐jumaily, Hassanien A.

doi:10.1097/scs.0000000000006991

Cited by 14 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 23 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In our research, the grafting material was completely absorbable, so it was not affecting the measurements [50]. Moreover, numerous papers backing a correlation between CBCT-derived bone GVs and primary and secondary implant stability, which is a clinically significant parameter, were published [51][52][53][54][55]. Nevertheless, the literature data on those correlations are ambiguous, which has to be taken into consideration when drawing conclusions [50].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 79%

The Assessment of the Usefulness of Platelet-Rich Fibrin in the Healing Process Bone Resorption

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The main subject of this research was the use of PRF in dental surgery aimed at preventing changes in alveolar height and width after tooth extraction. Due to the large growth factor content, it seems to be particularly useful in bone loss management starting from the simplest loss occurring after tooth extraction through loss resulting from tooth resection ending with loss caused by large bone cysts. The study was performed on 50 patients. The extraction of two maxillary or mandibular homonymous teeth was carried out in each patient, where PRF was placed in one alveolus while the other alveolus was left empty. Then, the alveoli were surgically managed with a split flap technique. On the extraction day, after 10 days, and after 6 months, the alveolar process was measured, soft tissues healing was assessed, and imaging examinations were analyzed. It was proved that the healing of soft tissues in the PRF group was better. In the PRF group after 6 months from surgery, the newly formed bone had higher grayscale values in volumetric tomography (CBCT). Moreover, the reduced atrophy of the alveolar process at the site of the extracted tooth was proved in this study.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 79%

The Assessment of the Usefulness of Platelet-Rich Fibrin in the Healing Process Bone Resorption

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…On the other hand, Degidi et al discovered a statistically negligible link between resonant frequency analysis results and mineralized bone–implant contact [ 38 ]. Also, a recent study conducted by Al Jamal and Al Jumaily in 2021 showed the use of CBCT to detect bone density is a reliable approach that is substantially connected with primary stability as measured by the implant stability meter [ 39 ].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluation of implant site preparation with piezosurgery versus conventional drills in terms of operation time, implant stability and bone density (randomized controlled clinical trial- split mouth design)

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background The preparation of the implant bed has a major influence on the success rate and long-term survival of dental implants. Piezoelectric devices and special implant drilling inserts are now emerging to replace conventional drills showing improved bone response and healing around implants. The purpose of this study is to compare the piezoelectric inserts versus the traditional drills for implant site preparation. Methods Twelve male patients who received a total of twenty-four dental implants have been selected to participate in this split-mouth clinical trial. Each patient received two implants; one installed after piezosurgery assisted osteotomy, while the contralateral side received the implant with the original drilling protocol. The timing of surgery, implant stability, and bone density around the installed dental implants have been evaluated during a follow-up period extended to 4 months. Results a significant difference in terms of time of surgery (p < 0.005) and in implant stability at 4 months (p = 0.024) on the study side, while a non-statistical significance in terms of bone density was detected (p = 0.468). Conclusion The piezoelectric implant site drilling protocol seemed to be a reliable and repeatable technique. Despite the limited sample size and lengthier operative time, the piezoelectric inserts enhanced bone quality and implant stability. Clinical trial registration Current Controlled Trials (ClinicalTrials.gov) https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05512273; the date of registration: 23/08/2022. Retrospectively registered.

show abstract

“…In clinical practice, Al-Jamal et al [ 22 ] demonstrated that there was a significant correlation between primary stability and IT using the AnyCheck® device in the context of 40 implants. However, they did not compare their findings with measurements obtained using the Osstell® device.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Validation of an implant stability measurement device using the percussion response: a clinical research study

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Several devices have been developed to measure implant-bone stability as an indicator of successful implant treatment; these include Osstell®, which measures the implant stability quotient (ISQ), and the more recent AnyCheck®, which relies on percussion for the implant stability test (IST). These devices make it possible to measure implant stability. However, no studies have compared the performance of AnyCheck® and Osstell® (i.e., IST and ISQ values) in clinical practice. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the correlation between primary and secondary implant stability using the Osstell® and AnyCheck® devices. Methods Ten patients (7 women; age [mean ± standard deviation]: 49.1 ± 13.3 years) with partially edentulous jaws who received a total of 15 implants were included. IST (AnyCheck®) and ISQ (Osstell®) values were measured immediately after implantation and at 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 weeks post-implantation. Each measurement was performed three times, and the average value was used as the result. The correlation between measurements obtained using the two devices was determined using Spearman's rank correlation coefficient. Results The IST values ranged from 79.1 ± 2.87 to 82.4 ± 2.65. The ISQ values ranged from 76.0 ± 2.8 to 80.2 ± 2.35. Spearman's rank correlation coefficient was r = 0.64 immediately after implantation, r = 0.29 at 1 week, r = 0.68 at 2 weeks, r = 0.53 at 3 weeks, r = 0.68 at 4 weeks, and r = 0.56 at 6 weeks. A positive correlation was found in all cases, except at week 1 when the correlation was weak; the IST and ISQ values decreased the most during the first postoperative week and increased during the second week. The IST values were also slightly higher at all measurement points. Conclusion The ability to assess implant stability without removing the abutment during healing is essential for determining the timing of loading without the risk of bone resorption. The results of this study suggest that AnyCheck® is useful for determining primary and secondary implant stability.

show abstract

Can the Bone Density Estimated by CBCT Predict the Primary Stability of Dental Implants? A New Measurement Protocol

Cited by 14 publications

References 23 publications

The Assessment of the Usefulness of Platelet-Rich Fibrin in the Healing Process Bone Resorption

The Assessment of the Usefulness of Platelet-Rich Fibrin in the Healing Process Bone Resorption

Evaluation of implant site preparation with piezosurgery versus conventional drills in terms of operation time, implant stability and bone density (randomized controlled clinical trial- split mouth design)

Validation of an implant stability measurement device using the percussion response: a clinical research study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About