2016
DOI: 10.1007/s00127-016-1235-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can the dissociative PTSD subtype be identified across two distinct trauma samples meeting caseness for PTSD?

Abstract: The results are discussed in light of their clinical implications and suggest that the dissociative subtype can be identified in victims of incest and victims of MVA suffering from whiplash meeting caseness for DSM-5 PTSD.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
21
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
21
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to the majority of previously conducted LCA and LPA studies of D-PTSD (Hansen et al, 2017) including the only other study of whiplash patients and D-PTSD (Hansen, Müllerová, et al, 2016), we were not able to identify the D-PTSD. Of note the samples included in the previous whiplash study, and the present study are very different.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 92%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In contrast to the majority of previously conducted LCA and LPA studies of D-PTSD (Hansen et al, 2017) including the only other study of whiplash patients and D-PTSD (Hansen, Müllerová, et al, 2016), we were not able to identify the D-PTSD. Of note the samples included in the previous whiplash study, and the present study are very different.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 92%
“…At the same time, the lack of positive results is unlikely to be attributed to the specific measurement of D-PTSD in the present study. Indeed, the HTQ and the TSC have been used in other studies which have identified the dissociative subtype (Armour, Elklit, Lauterbach, & Elhai, 2014;Hansen, Müllerová et al, 2016). Furthermore, the D-PTSD has been identified across several studies with only two-three items assessing dissociation as in the present study (cf.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Adults with complete missing data on all questionnaire items (n = 11; 2.3% of the sample) were excluded. Three alternative PTSD networks were estimated in stages, using items from across the HTQ and TSC (see Table 1): (a) Network 1: DSM-5 (21 items), (b) Network 2: DSM-5 with dissociation (23 items, as per Hansen, Műllerová, Elklit, and Armour, 2016), and (c) Network 3: ICD-11 CPTSD (12 items, as per Cloitre et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%