2020
DOI: 10.1080/02699931.2020.1760213
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can the induction of incidental positive emotions lead to different performances in sequential decision-making?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Manipulation checks only assessed whether hope was experienced in these conditions, not whether the experienced hope was integral hope or incidental hope. This is not dissimilar to other studies that have manipulated incidental vs integral emotions (de Hooge et al, 2008;Mailliez et al, 2020). Considering that the narrative for the integral hope condition specifically discussed the positive outcomes for the volunteering scenario and there were no other positive outcomes mentioned in that condition, it can be expected that the hope generated in the integral hope condition was "integral" to the volunteering context.…”
Section: Practical Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Manipulation checks only assessed whether hope was experienced in these conditions, not whether the experienced hope was integral hope or incidental hope. This is not dissimilar to other studies that have manipulated incidental vs integral emotions (de Hooge et al, 2008;Mailliez et al, 2020). Considering that the narrative for the integral hope condition specifically discussed the positive outcomes for the volunteering scenario and there were no other positive outcomes mentioned in that condition, it can be expected that the hope generated in the integral hope condition was "integral" to the volunteering context.…”
Section: Practical Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…This is consistent with other research that shows that hope and optimism, even though distinct constructs, share some overlap (Bryant and Cvengros, 2004). This could explain why other researchers have also used “optimism” as an item in multi-item scales used to measure hope (Mailliez et al , 2020). However, for theoretical consistency, it is recommended to use a more conceptually valid measure of hope (e.g.…”
Section: Limitations and Future Research Opportunitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can therefore be expected that incidental-specific emotions influence the use of DSSs. For example, it can be hypothesized that incidental happiness leads to better DSS use than incidental hope, especially due to the different feedback processing triggered by those two incidental emotions (Mailliez et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Perspectives and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A broad survey of the literature on emotional valence and risk attitudes reveals a set of notably inconsistent empirical results. Increases in positive affect has been linked with increases in risk-taking behaviour in some studies (Deldin & Levin, 1986;Grable & Roszkowski, 2008;Herman et al, 2018;Johnson, 1986;Mailliez et al, 2020;Otto & Eichstaedt, 2018;Schulreich et al, 2014), but with decreased risk taking in other work (Colasante et al, 2017;Isen & Patrick, 1983;Juergensen et al, 2018;Zhao, 2006). Likewise, increased negative affect has been linked in separate studies both with increased risk seeking (Buelow & Suhr, 2013;Raghunathan & Pham, 1999) and with increased risk aversion (Campos-Vazquez & Cuilty, 2014;Colasante et al, 2017;Heilman et al, 2010;Yuen & Lee, 2003).…”
Section: 1the Effects Of Emotional Valence On Risk Attitudesmentioning
confidence: 99%