“…We suggest that the spinose cylindrical taxa most common throughout the studied interval (stilostomellid species of the genus Strictocostella ) [ Hayward et al ., ] may have been shallow infaunally living species, according to their shape, distribution, and carbon isotope signature [ Hayward and Kawagata , ; Hayward et al ., ; Mancin et al ., ], anchored in the sediment by their spines [ Hottinger , ] and suspension feeding in the water column using their pseudopods extended through the complex aperture [e.g., Hottinger, , ; Mancin et al ., ]. Such a lifestyle would be in agreement with suggestions that they were infaunal, k‐strategist taxa with low metabolic rates [ Mancin et al ., ], and rules out the possibility of reworking as the cause of their high numbers in the sediment. Consequently, we suggest that changes in the assemblages over time dominantly reflect changes in current activity (thus food supplied to the benthic foraminifera) rather than changes in primary productivity, even if planktic foraminifera and nannofossils suggest decreased productivity during the PETM [ Kelly et al ., , ].…”