2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2004.08.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can therapeutic ultrasound influence the regeneration of peripheral nerves?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
82
0
7

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
82
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…37 The non-significant differences between Groups 1 and 2 indicate that the effects of the ultrasonic irradiation, though positive, are not pronounced, much less spectacular. This fact had already been observed in a previous investigation, in which the irradiation was initiated early, on the first postoperative day, and targeted the site of the actual injury, 19 with results evaluated only until the third week. In fact, the SFI, both in this and in that investigation, was virtually and statistically the same for the two groups in all the weeks, except for the third, but improved more expressively for Group 2, with a difference of 97% between the first and the last postoperative evaluation, by contrast with a difference of 79% for Group 1 in the same period.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…37 The non-significant differences between Groups 1 and 2 indicate that the effects of the ultrasonic irradiation, though positive, are not pronounced, much less spectacular. This fact had already been observed in a previous investigation, in which the irradiation was initiated early, on the first postoperative day, and targeted the site of the actual injury, 19 with results evaluated only until the third week. In fact, the SFI, both in this and in that investigation, was virtually and statistically the same for the two groups in all the weeks, except for the third, but improved more expressively for Group 2, with a difference of 97% between the first and the last postoperative evaluation, by contrast with a difference of 79% for Group 1 in the same period.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…14 Spontaneous or stimulated posttraumatic regeneration of the peripheral nerves has been the motive of experimental investigations by our group, mostly using the rat model of sciatic nerve crush injury, 3,[15][16][17][18] including investigations into the use of therapeutic ultrasound, 19,20 which confirmed the results of other authors, according to which ultrasonic irradiation effectively stimulates or accelerates conduction speed 21 and the actual regeneration of the peripheral nerves. 22 Ultrasonic or laser irradiation are preferably applied on the injured segment, [18][19][20] but irradiation at another site of the nerve chain, such as the spinal cord, 23 was also tested with equally positive results. From the anatomophysiological point of view, irradiation at the spinal cord level is logical, as it is targeted at the cell bodies of the motor and sensory neurons, already located.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 65%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the treatment of peripheral nerve injuries, suturing with vinyl and silk was done first; however in light of the number of sutures and the negative effects of the sutures on recovery, fibrin glue and wrapping the injured nerve were also tried. Electrical stimulation, therapeutic ultrasound, low-dose radiation, and low-intensity laser were also tested in experimental models to produce nerve regeneration and functional recovery (8,13,15,16,17).…”
Section: I-light Microscopic Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%