“…Logistic regression analysis revealed that the waist circumference was the only significant univariate predictor of preeclampsia (Z=2.04, P=0.04). The case control study by Anjali Gupta et al 15 PGIMS, Rohtak 2015 was aimed to evaluate the waist circumference as an anthropometric parameter in identifying women at risk of developing obstetric complications. The maternal and neonatal complications like preeclampsia (p = 0.0052, RR 0.5062, 95% CI 0.2935 -0.8728), gestational diabetes mellitus, preterm labor, postdatism, need for induction of labor (p value 0.0081, RR 0.6263, 95% CI 0.4314, 0.9091), instrumental vaginal delivery, cesarean delivery (p = 0.0072, RR 0.5745, 95% CI 0.3696, 0.8929), shoulder dystocia, PPH, macrosomia, neonatal asphyxia, admission to NICU were reported more in Group II women (waist circumference>80 cms) as compared to Group I (waist circumference<80 cms).…”