Can we decode phonetic features in inner speech using surface electromyography?

Abstract

Although having a long history of scrutiny in experimental psychology, it is still controversial whether inner speech (covert speech) production is accompanied by specific activity in speech muscles. We address this question by briefly reviewing previous findings related to inner speech and to the broader phenomenon of motor imagery. We then present the results of a preregistered experiment looking at the electromyographic correlates of both overt speech and inner speech production of two phonetic classes of nonwords. An automatic classification approach was undertaken to discriminate between two articulatory features contained in nonwords uttered in both overt and covert speech. Although this approach led to reasonable accuracy rates during overt speech production, it failed to discriminate inner speech phonetic content based on surface electromyography signals alone. However, exploratory analyses conducted at the individual level revealed that it seemed possible to distinguish between rounded and spread nonwords covertly produced, in two participants. We discuss these results in relation to the existing literature and suggest alternative ways to test the engagement of the speech motor system during inner speech production. Pre-registered protocol, preprint, data, as well as reproducible code and figures are available at: https://osf.io/czer4/.

Concepts, abstractness and inner speech

“…This proposal should be tested and verified in light of experimental evidence. To test the involvement of articulated inner speech, articulatory suppression and other verbal interference tasks could be employed, including surface electromyography (EMG) (but see [52,54]) and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). To test which kind of inner speech is activated, questionnaires focused on varieties of inner speech could be particularly useful (e.g.…”