2016
DOI: 10.1177/2332858416653756
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can We Measure the Transition to Reading? General Outcome Measures and Early Literacy Development From Preschool to Early Elementary Grades

Abstract: This study evaluated the extent to which existing measures met standards for a continuous suite of general outcome measures (GOMs) assessing children’s early literacy from preschool through early elementary school. The study assessed 316 children from age 3 years (2 years prekindergarten) through Grade 2, with 8 to 10 measures of language, alphabetic principle, phonological awareness, and beginning reading. We evaluated measures at each grade group against six standards for GOMs extracted from earlier work. We… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings have at least three implications for assessment and intervention in early childhood education. First, seasonal growth for all IGDIs is consistent with at least one criterion for general outcome measurement, sensitivity to change (Fuchs & Deno, 1991; McConnell & Wackerle-Hollman, 2016). Earlier versions of the measures evaluated here demonstrated empirical relations to elementary-grade reading outcomes (Missall et al, 2007), and similar evidence for revised tools used here will be important for future research.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These findings have at least three implications for assessment and intervention in early childhood education. First, seasonal growth for all IGDIs is consistent with at least one criterion for general outcome measurement, sensitivity to change (Fuchs & Deno, 1991; McConnell & Wackerle-Hollman, 2016). Earlier versions of the measures evaluated here demonstrated empirical relations to elementary-grade reading outcomes (Missall et al, 2007), and similar evidence for revised tools used here will be important for future research.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Table 2 provides means, standard deviations, skew, kurtosis, and standard error of student scores by measures and seasons in Rasch score units, or logits . With the exception of First Sounds, measure means change by .5 to more than 1.5 logits across seasons ( M = .974), standard deviations are relatively stable at or near 1.5 logits, and skew and kurtosis measures are within limits for MTSS decision making (McConnell & Wackerle-Hollman, 2016).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, in the current study, the majority of the participants were in kindergarten with a minority in first grade; however, van den Bosch and colleagues' (2020) sample solely consisted of second grade students. Children in kindergarten and first grade are typically at the start of transitioning from pre-literacy to literacy, while children in second grade are firmly in the literacy stage, assuming the children are typically developing (McConnell & Wackerle-Hollman, 2016). As children get older, decoding skills become relatively automatized, which provides children the opportunity to focus on more complex skills such as comprehension.…”
Section: Within-language Relations Between Oral Language and Readingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In SSMMs, reading is "divided" into specific sub-skills, which are prioritized and for which individual tests are formed consisting of both the teaching goal and specific subskill measurement for monitoring progress (Hintze, Christ, & Methe, 2006). These measurements may emphasize a lot on a specific skill and not on the overall students' skills (Fuchs & Deno, 1991;McConnell & Wackerle-Hollman, 2015). As initially reported by Fuchs and Deno (1991) but also more recently by Ball and Christ (2012), these measurements are more suitable for short-term interventions, as they are not appropriate for generating the students' general overview and developmental level.…”
Section: Curriculum Based Measurement In Readingmentioning
confidence: 99%