2020
DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.6942
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Canadian Urological Association Best Practice Report: Diagnosis and management of sporadic angiomyolipomas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
1
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
1
6
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Neither the most recent Canadian nor European Urology Association guidelines recommend a specific size threshold for treatment. [8,10] In our series, emergency cases receiving SAE had a mean diameter of 12.3cm and the smallest tumour by diameter was 4.7cm, with the remainder greater than 9cm .This was similar for patients with pre-intervention evidence of retroperitoneal haemorrhage. Our study is not designed or powered to make statements on elective thresholds for treatment.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Neither the most recent Canadian nor European Urology Association guidelines recommend a specific size threshold for treatment. [8,10] In our series, emergency cases receiving SAE had a mean diameter of 12.3cm and the smallest tumour by diameter was 4.7cm, with the remainder greater than 9cm .This was similar for patients with pre-intervention evidence of retroperitoneal haemorrhage. Our study is not designed or powered to make statements on elective thresholds for treatment.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…The lack of prospective, randomized studies in the management of AMLs and the significant heterogeneity in the available retrospective evidence presents a challenge in many aspects of their clinical management. [10] Current evidence shows that the chance of becoming symptomatic from an AML increases significantly with size greater than 4cm or growth rate greater than 0.25cm/year. The traditional cut-off has been 4cm before intervention, however some now recommend not intervening until size is greater than 6cm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The natural history of rAML is controversial and varies between studies. The clinical course has been correlated with age at presentation, blood group, and location of tumor ( 13 15 ). The correlation between the size of tumors and growth is controversial.…”
Section: Epidemiology Pathogenesis and Natural Coursementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The choice to switch from surveillance to start treatment depends on the presence of symptoms as well as tumor size (>4–6 cm is an accepted cut-off, although controversial) ( 13 ). Treatment options include surgery and embolization of blood vessels.…”
Section: Management Of Raml: Different Scenarios and Latest Developmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%