2006
DOI: 10.1097/01.ta.0000195977.18035.40
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cancellous Allograft versus Autologous Bone Grafting For Repair of Comminuted Distal Radius Fractures: A Prospective, Randomized Trial

Abstract: By the use of the investigated allograft no adverse effects were detected on the outcome of the treated radius fractures. Therefore, this new allograft could be a desirable alternative to autologous bone grafting from the iliac crest, as operating and anesthetics times are shortened and complications of iliac crest bone grafting avoided.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
49
0
7

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
49
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…[8,9] Current bone regeneration methods utilize biological or synthetic grafts, including autografts, allografts, or xenografts, but their wider application is limited by histocompatibility issues, restricted supplies, and the requirement for a secondary surgery. [10][11][12][13] To sidestep some of these issues, a number of studies have explored synthetic alternatives, because they have unlimited availability and do not risk disease transmission from a donor.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[8,9] Current bone regeneration methods utilize biological or synthetic grafts, including autografts, allografts, or xenografts, but their wider application is limited by histocompatibility issues, restricted supplies, and the requirement for a secondary surgery. [10][11][12][13] To sidestep some of these issues, a number of studies have explored synthetic alternatives, because they have unlimited availability and do not risk disease transmission from a donor.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rajan and colleagues treated 75 patients with comminuted distal radius fractures with either autograft or allograft. 6 Clinical and radiographic outcomes 1 year following surgery were similar in both groups. Ring and colleagues treated 35 patients with autografts and plate fixation for diaphyseal forearm nonunions and segmental defects.…”
Section: Clinical Outcomes Autograftmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…7 The most common complication is postoperative pain at the donor site, occurring in 50% of patients and persisting through 1 year in up to 29% of patients. 5,6 Additional commonly reported problems include nerve injury, hemorrhage, fracture, and hernia. [25][26][27][28] Due to this significant morbidity, autologous bone grafting …”
Section: Clinical Outcomes Autograftmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Autologous bone grafting is widely accepted as the gold standard for bone repair and regeneration because of the osteogenicity of autologous bone [1], but the insufficient amount of donor tissue and associated donor site pain and morbidity motivate the search for a better approach to repairing bone defects [2,3]. Towards this goal, synthetic materials have been extensively studied as potential autograft substitutes [4,5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%