1998
DOI: 10.1007/s004200050269
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cancer incidence among Finnish workers exposed to aromatic hydrocarbons

Abstract: The data are not supportive of an overall increase in the cancer risk for these solvents, even though we cannot rule out site-specific associations with the rectum, pancreas, and nervous system. There is supporting evidence in the epidemiology literature for pancreatic cancer risk and heavy exposure to styrene. More studies are warranted on solvents, with detailed information on lifetime exposures and habits being collected whenever possible.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
18
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…National Toxicology Program studies found no evidence of carcinogenic activity in mice and rats that were exposed to organic solvents at high doses [NTP, 1986[NTP, , 1990. Nevertheless, there have been a number of occupational exposure studies that have found excess cancer risk to solvent-exposed workers including cancers of the nervous system [Anttila et al, 1998], respiratory tract [Svensson et al, 1990], bone [Wiebelt and Becker, 1999], and liver and biliary tract [Lynge et al, 1997]. Our study found an elevated, though not statistically significant (SMR ¼ 1.05), risk of cancer death for this cohort.…”
Section: All Cancersupporting
confidence: 40%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…National Toxicology Program studies found no evidence of carcinogenic activity in mice and rats that were exposed to organic solvents at high doses [NTP, 1986[NTP, , 1990. Nevertheless, there have been a number of occupational exposure studies that have found excess cancer risk to solvent-exposed workers including cancers of the nervous system [Anttila et al, 1998], respiratory tract [Svensson et al, 1990], bone [Wiebelt and Becker, 1999], and liver and biliary tract [Lynge et al, 1997]. Our study found an elevated, though not statistically significant (SMR ¼ 1.05), risk of cancer death for this cohort.…”
Section: All Cancersupporting
confidence: 40%
“…Other studies of shoeworker cohorts [Enterline and McKiever, 1963;Decoufle and Walrath, 1983;Garabrant and Wegman, 1984;NIOSH, 1984;Pippard and Acheson, 1985;Schoenberg et al, 1987;Walrath et al, 1987;Brownson et al, 1993;Fu et al, 1996;Jöckel et al, 1998] and solvent-exposed worker populations [Svensson et al, 1990;Chen and Seaton, 1996;Anttila et al, 1998;Gerin et al, 1998;Wiebelt and Becker, 1999] have provided inconclusive results relating solvent exposure to lung cancer mortality and incidence.…”
Section: Lung Cancermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conversely, other studies that examined toluene as a possible risk factor for cancer did not find any significant association between exposure to toluene and cancer. For example, Antilla et al [13] found no increase in overall cancer risk for cancers at specific tissues associated with exposure to toluene, except for a non-significant increase in the incidence of lung cancer in Finnish workers who were exposed to toluene for more than 10 years.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 The substantial worldwide variation in incidence rates for colorectal cancer may be explained by dietary and other environmental factors. 2 Colorectal cancer is not commonly considered to be occupational in etiology, but elevated risks have been reported among workers in the textile industry, 3,4 in the automobile industry, [5][6][7] in the beverage industry, 8 in subjects exposed to asbestos, 9-12 dioxin, 13 wood dust, 14 organic solvents [15][16][17] and metal-working fluids. 18 The risk of colorectal cancer is generally found to be lower in farmers, although the reason for these deficits are not entirely clear, lower smoking rates and higher levels of physical activity may be involved.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%