1982
DOI: 10.1016/0360-3016(82)90446-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cancer of the uterine cervix: Dosimetric guidelines for prevention of late rectal and rectosigmoid complications as a result of radiotherapeutic treatment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
34
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In their LDR series, Perez et al 30 and Pourquier et al 31 demonstrated a positive correlation between a dose to the rectum and bladder of Ͼ 80 Gy and severe complications. They reported that the rates of Grade 2 and 3 complications in the urinary tract and rectosigmoid colon were approximately 5% with doses Ͻ 75-80 Gy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In their LDR series, Perez et al 30 and Pourquier et al 31 demonstrated a positive correlation between a dose to the rectum and bladder of Ͼ 80 Gy and severe complications. They reported that the rates of Grade 2 and 3 complications in the urinary tract and rectosigmoid colon were approximately 5% with doses Ͻ 75-80 Gy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Pourquier et al (27), Stryker et al (28), and Montana and Fowler (29) showed that the incidence of complications increased sharply with the mean dose calculated from lateral radiographs at several points on the anterior surface of the rectum. Perez et al (30) found that doses calculated at specific points defined only with reference to the applicators also showed a strong correlation with complications.…”
Section: Incidence and Risk Factorsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Since a good correlation between the dose to critical organs and complication rate and severity was found [4,6,16,17,24], with particular influence of the dose from brachytherapy [21,22], these modifications may be a way to improve therapeutic ratio of cervical cancer radiotherapy. However, all these improvements are secondary to restrictions put by applicator geometry extorted by patients' anatomical conditions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%