2004
DOI: 10.2486/indhealth.42.321
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cancer Risk Assessment of Toxaphene

Abstract: The primary purpose is to do cancer risk assessment of toxaphene by using four steps of risk assessment proposed by the United States National Academy of Sciences/National Research Council (NAS/NRC). Four steps of risk assessment including hazard identification, dose-response relationship, exposure assessment, and risk characterization were used to evaluate cancer risk of toxaphene. Toxaphene was the most heavily used insecticide in many parts of the world before it was banned in 1982. It increased incidence o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Hazard Quotient (HQ) was used to assess risk associated with non-carcinogenic and carcinogenic health effect. For non-carcinogenic health effects the HQ was obtained by dividing the EDI by the ADI [106] while for the carcinogenic effect, the HQ was calculated by multiplying the EDI by the cancer slope factor (CSF) [100] , [15] . The HQ for non-cancer and cancer risk were estimated for the average, maximum, 50th and 95th percentiles of the measured exposure concentrations (MEC) of pesticide residues in each tissue to assess the risk posed to human health on consumption of contaminated cattle tissue.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Hazard Quotient (HQ) was used to assess risk associated with non-carcinogenic and carcinogenic health effect. For non-carcinogenic health effects the HQ was obtained by dividing the EDI by the ADI [106] while for the carcinogenic effect, the HQ was calculated by multiplying the EDI by the cancer slope factor (CSF) [100] , [15] . The HQ for non-cancer and cancer risk were estimated for the average, maximum, 50th and 95th percentiles of the measured exposure concentrations (MEC) of pesticide residues in each tissue to assess the risk posed to human health on consumption of contaminated cattle tissue.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The value of the slope factor was 1.2 per mg/kg-day, essentially the same as the 1991 EPA slope factor. In 2004, Buranatrevedh (2004) derived a CSF of 0.86 per mg/kg-day from the original rodent data, also a similar value. The major and insurmountable difficulty with all of these derivations is that all are based on application of TT to rodents and may not be appropriate for evaluating the potential toxicity of WT to humans.…”
Section: Cancer Slope Factors For Technical Toxaphenementioning
confidence: 97%
“…They have been variously linked to the following effects: cancer; nervous system damages; reproductive and immune system impairments; and hormonal imbalances. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] As such, there have been concerns about the levels of exposure, identifying the pathways of exposure, and efforts to reduce exposures. It is often believed that the main route of exposure to POPs is via the diet, but there are several other possibilities.…”
Section: Human Exposure and Health Concernsmentioning
confidence: 99%