Cancer risk in socially marginalised women: An exploratory study

Abstract

BackgroundCancer is a leading cause of premature death in women worldwide, and is associated with socio-economic disadvantage. Yet many interventions designed to reduce risk and improve health fail to reach the most marginalised with the greatest needs. Our study focused on socially marginalised women at two women's centres that provide support and training to women in the judicial system or who have experienced domestic abuse.MethodsThis qualitative study was framed within a sociological rather than behavioural perspective involving thirty participants in individual interviews and focus groups. It sought to understand perceptions of, and vulnerability to, cancer; decision making (including screening); cancer symptom awareness; and views on health promoting activities within the context of the women's social circumstances.FindingsWomen's experiences of social adversity profoundly shaped their practices, aspirations and attitudes towards risk, health and healthcare. We found that behaviours such as unhealthy eating and smoking need to be understood in the context of inherently risky lives. They were a coping mechanism whilst living in extreme adverse circumstances, navigating complex everyday lives and structural failings. Long term experiences of neglect, harm and violence, often by people they should be able to trust, led to low self-esteem and influenced their perceptions of risk and self-care. This was reinforced by negative experiences of navigating state services and a lack of control and agency over their own lives.ConclusionWomen in this study were at high risk of cancer, but it would be better to understand these risk factors as markers of distress and duress. Without appreciating the wider determinants of health and systemic disadvantage of marginalised groups, and addressing these with a structural rather than an individual response, we risk increasing cancer inequities by failing those who are in the greatest need.

LSE–Lancet Commission on the future of the NHS: re-laying the foundations for an equitable and efficient health and care service after COVID-19

“…63 These inequalities are particularly prominent for many marginalised groups, such as minority ethnic groups, migrants, people who are incarcerated, and people who are subjected to domestic abuse. 399,400 Novel routes to diagnosis should be co-developed and tested with communities to ensure their acceptability to the populations that they seek to target, crucially not stigmatising groups with behaviours that put them at high risk and further decreasing the likelihood for engagement with diagnostic services. One positive example has been the implementation of low-dose CT screening for chest symptoms in deprived areas of Manchester, UK, which was co-developed with the community through social media, patient stories, awareness and briefing sessions, leafleting and posters, letters from general practitioners, and messages on prescriptions.…”

Perspectives of informal caregivers who support people following hip fracture surgery: a qualitative study embedded within the HIP HELPER feasibility trial

“…It was not necessary to operationalise the concept of saturation, firstly, given our sampling approach, and secondly, we recognise that meaning is generated through interpretation of data are inescapably situated and subjective 20 21. As per Hanson et al ’s22 approach, we analysed the data to identify recurrent themes generated from the analysis. At 10 participant-dyads, we started to see recurring themes and ideas.…”

Qualitative Research Methods in Chronic Disease: Introduction and Opportunities to Promote Health Equity

“…Qualitative research provides insight into different phases of the chronic disease evidence generation continuum. This includes a contextualized understanding of the factors that place people at risk for disease, the conditions affecting access to screening and care, patient experiences during acute treatment, and challenges to chronic disease self-management ( 14 , 51 , 56 , 59 , 82 , 129 ). Qualitative research can include longitudinal and prospective explorations across multiple time points along the chronic disease continuum to highlight places for intervention or for improving the delivery of care for patients across the disease trajectory (e.g., 69 , 119 ).…”