2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2005.06.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cancer staging and survival in colon cancer is dependent on the quality of the pathologists’ specimen examination

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
77
0
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
8
77
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…O envolvimento de linfonodos regionais é de crítica importância para o prognóstico 24,42,43 e sua aná-lise é mandatória 24 , mas o acesso macroscópico dos linfonodos é inviável, já que uma considerável parte das metástases linfonodais ( mais de 30%) têm em seu maior diâmetro 3mm ou menos 24,43 .…”
Section: Média De Gânglios Dissecados Média De Gânglios Positivosunclassified
“…O envolvimento de linfonodos regionais é de crítica importância para o prognóstico 24,42,43 e sua aná-lise é mandatória 24 , mas o acesso macroscópico dos linfonodos é inviável, já que uma considerável parte das metástases linfonodais ( mais de 30%) têm em seu maior diâmetro 3mm ou menos 24,43 .…”
Section: Média De Gânglios Dissecados Média De Gânglios Positivosunclassified
“…The prognostic significance of local invasion, lymph node status and lymph node yields (Pocard et al, 1998;Wong et al, 1999;Tepper et al, 2001;Cserni et al, 2002;Goldstein, 2002;Johnson et al, 2002;Prandi et al, 2002;Joseph et al, 2003;Pheby et al, 2004;Baxter et al, 2005;Jestin et al, 2005;Sarli et al, 2005), peritoneal involvement, tumour perforation and vascular invasion (Talbot et al, 1980;Shepherd et al, 1989;Shepherd et al, 1995;Shepherd et al, 1997;Petersen et al, 2002) have all previously been documented. The results of this study confirm these findings in a large population-based setting.…”
Section: Local Invasion Lymph Node Status Peritoneal Involvement Anmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several groups have observed a relationship between the number of lymph nodes identified at pathological examination and survival in colorectal cancer patients, examining usually Dukes' B, or Dukes' B and C patients (Michiels et al, 1994;Caplin et al, 1998;Tepper et al, 2001;Cserni et al, 2002;Goldstein, 2002;Prandi et al, 2002;Swanson et al, 2003;Jestin et al, 2005). All groups have concluded that the observed improvement in survival was an artefact brought about by inadequate laboratory technique: that is, had more nodes been examined, some of those staged as Dukes' B would have been found to be Dukes' C patients, with consequently poorer survival.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%