1995
DOI: 10.3109/02841869509127235
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cancer Therapy With Radiolabeled Antibodies An Overview

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using a chimeric MoAb like rituximab in radioimmunotherapy could strongly reduce HAMA (human anti-mouse antibody) responses in patients. However, the prolonged biological half-life of the humanized MoAbs could cause problems with increased radiation dose to normal tissues, and hence a decreased therapeutic index, when isotopes with longer half-life (days) are utilized (Bruland, 1995;Multani and Grossbard, 1999). The use of a relatively shortlived isotope like 211 At will make those differences in biological half-life less relevant.…”
Section: mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using a chimeric MoAb like rituximab in radioimmunotherapy could strongly reduce HAMA (human anti-mouse antibody) responses in patients. However, the prolonged biological half-life of the humanized MoAbs could cause problems with increased radiation dose to normal tissues, and hence a decreased therapeutic index, when isotopes with longer half-life (days) are utilized (Bruland, 1995;Multani and Grossbard, 1999). The use of a relatively shortlived isotope like 211 At will make those differences in biological half-life less relevant.…”
Section: mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of 188 Re, we found 0.4545 g-Gy/MBq-h. However, we found significantly (Bardies and Chatal, 1994) 768 (Nahum, 1996) 201 Tl 20.68 (Unak, 1997) 44.748 (Unak, 1997) 20 (Rao et al,1985) 43.3 (Kassis et al, 1983) 43.5 (Ftacnikova and Bohm, 2000) 204 Tl 1.10 (this study) 245.219 (Unak, 1997) 243 (Kassis et al, 1983) 55 Fe 5.341 (Unak, 1997) 5.803 (Unak, 1997) 4.75 (Humm et al, 1994) 4.0471.66 (Humm et al, 1994) 51 Cr 5.420 (Unak, 1997) 3.652 (Unak, 1997) 5.42 (Kassis et al, 1983) 3.65 (Vezza et al, 1987) 99m Tc 5.15 (Unak, 1997) 17.286 (Unak, 1997) 5.13 (Makrigiorgos et al, 1989) 17.28 (Makrigiorgos et al, 1989) 16.2 (Ftacnikova and Bohm, 2000) Bruland has reported that in a radical course of radiotherapy a total of 50-80 Gy must be delivered to the tumor (Bruland, 1995). Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In general, the clinical therapeutic use of radiolabelled antibodies has been disappointing among patients with solid cancers (9). P. Abrams, Seattle, presented preclinical and clinical data on a pre-targeting/multistep approach using streptavidin-conjugated antibody followed by a clearing step using biotinylated human serum albumin.…”
Section: Therapeutic Nuclear Oncologymentioning
confidence: 99%