2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0378-3758(02)00226-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Candelabra systems and designs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
67
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
67
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There are many known Steiner 2 − designs but constructing Steiner > 2 it has proved to be much harder. In the case of = 3, Kageyama [11] has shown thatthere is 3 − ( , 4,1) design if andonly if the necessary arithmetic conditions are satisfied. But for larger k, even = 5, the result is far from complete.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many known Steiner 2 − designs but constructing Steiner > 2 it has proved to be much harder. In the case of = 3, Kageyama [11] has shown thatthere is 3 − ( , 4,1) design if andonly if the necessary arithmetic conditions are satisfied. But for larger k, even = 5, the result is far from complete.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many known Steiner 2 − designs but constructing Steiner > 2 it has proved to be much harder. Wilson (1972aWilson ( ,1972b building upon the work of many including ( [3], [7], [10], and [11]) proved for = 2 , fixed k and sufficiently large v satisfying arithmetic conditions 2 −designs exist. There is no similar existence result yet for > 2.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Algebraic construction requires that a certain fixed (big) group to act as a group of automorphisms for the desired design. This technique was first formulated on paper by [11].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first recursive construction for 3-GDDs is a special case of the fundamental construction for t-GDDs in [16 Proof. From the given HF (m, 6, 4, 3), we also have an HF (m, 6, 4, 3), (X, G, B, F), containing exactly one hole of size h and (m − h)/2 holes of size 2, which are mutually disjoint.…”
Section: Say That a T-gdd (X G B ) Is A Subdesign Of A T-gdd (X mentioning
confidence: 99%