2009
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/200811407
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Candidate counterparts to the soft gamma-ray flare in the direction of LS I +61 303

Abstract: Context. A short duration burst reminiscent of a soft gamma-ray repeater/anomalous X-ray pulsar behaviour was detected in the direction of LS I +61 303 by the Swift satellite. While the association with this well known gamma-ray binary is likely, a different origin cannot be excluded. Aims. We explore the error box of this unexpected flaring event and establish the radio, near-infrared and X-ray sources in our search for any peculiar alternative counterpart. Methods. We carried out a combined analysis of archi… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sometimes, several observations can be combined to produce a single deep radio map and reanalyzed with an aim different from the one it was originally planned. Similar approaches have been conducted by our group for X-ray binaries showing how useful archival data can be (see e. g. Sánchez-Sutil et al 2008;Muñoz-Arjonilla et al 2009). …”
Section: Grs 1758-258 Revisited In the Radiomentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Sometimes, several observations can be combined to produce a single deep radio map and reanalyzed with an aim different from the one it was originally planned. Similar approaches have been conducted by our group for X-ray binaries showing how useful archival data can be (see e. g. Sánchez-Sutil et al 2008;Muñoz-Arjonilla et al 2009). …”
Section: Grs 1758-258 Revisited In the Radiomentioning
confidence: 80%
“…2), translating in a count-rate of 0.0010 ± 0.0002 counts s −1 . No radio, infrared or optical counterparts have been detected for this source despite the deep archival observations covering this field of view (see Muñoz-Arjonilla et al 2009; this source corresponds to their #12 of Table 3). Thus, formally we can not exclude that the faint X-ray source detected by Chandra at the limit of the 1σ positional uncertainty of the burst (see Fig.…”
Section: Analysis Of Rxte-hexte Observations: Can Thementioning
confidence: 94%
“…Finally, we ponder how likely could it be that within this spatial extent, FAST is actually detecting a different pulsar lying within the angular resolution (at the L-band) of FAST, ∼ 2.9 38 . For LS I +61 • 303 in particular, a similar issue appeared when analyzing the magnetar-like flares detected from the same region [10][11][12] . Swift, the X-ray satellite that observed them, had a ∼ 1.4 positional uncertainty and no other candidate different from LS I +61 • 303 was found.…”
Section: Uncertaintiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A reanalysis of the flare data, as well as a subsequent 96 ks observations with the Chandra X-ray telescope, did not reveal any other candidate in that region either 13 . Neither it did a combined analysis of archive Very Large Array radio data nor near infrared observations 12 . These studies concluded that the simplest explanation is that LS I +61 • 303 was the origin of the flares.…”
Section: Uncertaintiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation