2003
DOI: 10.1086/378610
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Candidate Type II Quasars from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. I. Selection and Optical Properties of a Sample at 0.3<Z<0.83

Abstract: Type II quasars are the long-sought luminous analogs of type II (narrow emission line) Seyfert galaxies, suggested by unification models of active galactic nuclei (AGN) and postulated to account for an appreciable fraction of the cosmic hard X-ray background. We present a sample of 291 type II AGN at redshifts 0.3 < Z < 0.83 from the spectroscopic data of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. These objects have narrow (FWHM< 2000 km s −1 ), high equivalent width emission lines with high-ionization line ratios. We desc… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

15
414
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 344 publications
(430 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
15
414
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We consider the [NeV]3346,3426 emission lines to be unambiguous signs of an underlying AGN continuum (Groves et al 2004;Nagao et al 2006), so if either one of these lines is detected (if a single line is detected, it is usually [NeV]3426), the object is considered an AGN. If neither of the [NeV] lines is detected, we use the criterion FWHM([O iii]5007) > 400 km s −1 as a sign of AGN activity (Zakamska et al 2003;Hao et al 2005a). Since the [NeV] lines are weak, our selection is more robust at high luminosities, where these lines are more likely to be detected.…”
Section: Spectroscopic Selection Of Type 2 Quasarsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We consider the [NeV]3346,3426 emission lines to be unambiguous signs of an underlying AGN continuum (Groves et al 2004;Nagao et al 2006), so if either one of these lines is detected (if a single line is detected, it is usually [NeV]3426), the object is considered an AGN. If neither of the [NeV] lines is detected, we use the criterion FWHM([O iii]5007) > 400 km s −1 as a sign of AGN activity (Zakamska et al 2003;Hao et al 2005a). Since the [NeV] lines are weak, our selection is more robust at high luminosities, where these lines are more likely to be detected.…”
Section: Spectroscopic Selection Of Type 2 Quasarsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As Hα is redshifted out of the optical bandpass at z 0.5 > , alternative obscured AGN selection methods using observed optical spectra have been developed to capitalize on the existing rich data sets from wide-area optical surveys, including: Gilli et al 2010;Mignoli et al 2013) 20 ; 5. a combination of narrow emission lines withFWHMva-lues <2000 km s −1 , ratios of narrow emission lines suggesting AGNs rather than star formation ionization, and a high [O III] luminosity, which is applicable between z 0.3 0.83 < < (Zakamska et al 2003;Reyes et al 2008); 6. strong C IV and Lyα emission with FWHM <2000 km s −1 and weak rest-frame ultraviolet continuum values, which identifies AGNs between z 2 4.3 < < (Alexandroff et al 2013; see also Steidel et al 2002;Hainline et al 2011).…”
Section: Identifying Type 2 Agnsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The only other sample that spans a comparable redshift range is selected in a very similar way from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) Data Release 1 (DR1) by Zakamska et al (2003). Their sample consists of 291 type-2 AGN at 0.3 < z < 0.83 (the redshift range chosen to ensure that the [O iii]λ5007 Å line is present in all spectra).…”
Section: Comparison With Other Optical Surveysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3, are: 1) the lines are relatively strong; 2) the line ratios are relatively insensitive to reddening corrections because of their close separation; and 3) at least at low redshift (z 0.5) the lines are accessible using ground-based optical telescopes. Several samples have been selected in the past using the BPT diagrams and the method select AGN reliably with high completeness (Dessauges-Zavadsky et al 2000;Zakamska et al 2003;Hao et al 2005b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%