Canine behaviour problems: discussions between veterinarians and dog owners during annual booster consultations

Abstract

The veterinary profession recently acknowledged its responsibility to provide behaviour support, following criticism for focussing on the physiological aspects of welfare and overlooking the psychological. To further understand the practising of behavioural medicine, a 'fly-on-the-wall' approach was used to investigate welfare discussions during dog booster vaccinations. Seventeen consultations involving six veterinarians in two UK small-animal practices were videoed. Qualitative methods were used to analyse themes discussed and questionnaires completed to obtain participant information and perceptions. Five main topics of discussion were identified: navigation, medical, husbandry, behaviour and cost. Veterinarians led the discussion of all topics except behaviour which was instigated approximately equally by veterinarian and client. All clients reported one or more behaviours that were a concern to them, totalling 58 across the sample. Disconcertingly, only 10 were discussed during consultations and none fully explored nor managed beyond the consultation. Behaviour discussion varies between veterinarians; this may reflect their experience, confidence or clients' requests. Owners access welfare information from a variety of sources, not always from veterinarians. Where sources are not knowledgeable, both human and animal welfare can be seriously compromised. Veterinarians need to ensure that clients are enabled to discuss behaviour issues and are provided with appropriate support, be that in-house or via referral.

Experiences of veterinarians in clinical behavior practice: A mixed-methods study

“…Unfortunately, this lack of education and training in behavioral medicine leaves many veterinarians unprepared to identify, manage, and treat companion animal behavioral problems (Juarbe-Diaz, 2008). It also results in veterinarians who do not screen for behavioral issues as part of their practice and do not feel confident discussing behavioral problems with pet owners (Patronek and Dodman, 1999;Roshier and McBride, 2013). The ramifications of these issues on the pet population have been detailed elsewhere (Overall, 2013a).…”

A Survey of Rabbit Handling Methods Within the United Kingdom and the Republic of Ireland

“…However, there was a disparity across the handling methods and the different groups concerning familiarity with, perceived suitability of, and frequency of use. These differences may reflect the range of information sources and knowledge quality available to rabbit owners, as with other species (Roshier & McBride, 2012).…”

A Report on the First International Workshop on Research Methods in Animal-Computer Interaction

“…These topics are also essential to ACI, particularly where an understanding of both the species and individual is a key component of the design and evaluation process [8]. Her experiences of research methods included qualitative methods of surveys and interviews [31], ethological methods of observing and interpreting animal behaviour; and quantitative methods in biomedical engineering to evaluate injury mechanisms [18]. Her introduction to the discipline of ACI stemmed from a collaborative project developing a horse automated behaviour interaction tool [26].…”