2020
DOI: 10.1177/0308275x20929395
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Canine counterinsurgency in Indian-occupied Kashmir

Abstract: In this article, we analyze contemporary discourses of counterinsurgency in relation to dogs in Kashmir, the disputed northernmost Himalayan territory of Jammu and Kashmir, and the site of a prolonged military occupation. We are interested in the widespread presence of street dogs in Kashmir as both embodiments and instruments of military terror. We consider the competing narratives of how canines function variously in Kashmiri perceptions of counterinsurgency and in Indian nationalist discourses. Through ethn… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The high rates of purebred dog abandonment, specifically, indicate that additional factors influence the purchase, and eventually relinquishment of dogs at Indian shelters. In their ethnographic analysis, Bhan and Bose (2020) describe purebred dogs as a symbol of middle- and upper-class Indian identity, with potential roots in colonial messaging that distinguished British authorities and their “pedigree dogs” from Indian subjects and street dogs [ 46 ]. Volsche, Mohan, Gray and Rangawamy (2019) surveyed college students in Bangalore, India, with 89% of the total sample identifying as upper or upper-middle-class [ 47 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The high rates of purebred dog abandonment, specifically, indicate that additional factors influence the purchase, and eventually relinquishment of dogs at Indian shelters. In their ethnographic analysis, Bhan and Bose (2020) describe purebred dogs as a symbol of middle- and upper-class Indian identity, with potential roots in colonial messaging that distinguished British authorities and their “pedigree dogs” from Indian subjects and street dogs [ 46 ]. Volsche, Mohan, Gray and Rangawamy (2019) surveyed college students in Bangalore, India, with 89% of the total sample identifying as upper or upper-middle-class [ 47 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most active among residents collected money for the vaccination and sterilization of strays and grieved when furry neighbourhood regulars left and never returned. Such attention to the needs of others recognized precarity as a condition shared across various species and life forms (Archambault 2016; Johnson 2019; on dog/human precarity in non‐Western contexts, see Bhan & Bose 2020; Narayanan 2017; Sandoval‐Cervantes 2016).…”
Section: (Islamic) Care Ethics After Socialismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Drawing on notions of Zionist colonialism, she considers race as a key driver of violence against Palestinians and analyses racialised bodies as 'territories' for conquest. Bhan and Bose (2020) broaden the discourse of occupation into contested human-animal relations in a powerful ethnographic reflection on the role of dogs in the ongoing struggle in Indian-occupied Kashmir. The occupying authorities deploy dogs as the first line of military defence against Kashmiri resistance.…”
Section: A N T H R O P O L O G Y O F V a L U E S : B E Y O N D S U F F E R I N G S U B J E C T H O O Dmentioning
confidence: 99%