1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0014-2999(99)00189-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cannabinoid penetration into mouse brain as determined by ex vivo binding

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
19
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Δ 9 -THC was shown to decrease rate of responding for food in wildtype C57BL/6J mice and not transgenic mice lacking CB 1 receptors, whereas methanandamide produced similar decreases in rate of responding in both wildtype and CB 1 knockout mice (Baskfield et al 2004). These results do not appear to reflect inability of methanandamide to bind to CB 1 receptors in mouse brain inasmuch as a previous study (Petitet et al 1999) reported that methanandamide binds to cannabinoid receptors in mouse brain after i.p. administration at the doses and interval of pretreatment chosen for the present study.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 70%
“…For example, Δ 9 -THC was shown to decrease rate of responding for food in wildtype C57BL/6J mice and not transgenic mice lacking CB 1 receptors, whereas methanandamide produced similar decreases in rate of responding in both wildtype and CB 1 knockout mice (Baskfield et al 2004). These results do not appear to reflect inability of methanandamide to bind to CB 1 receptors in mouse brain inasmuch as a previous study (Petitet et al 1999) reported that methanandamide binds to cannabinoid receptors in mouse brain after i.p. administration at the doses and interval of pretreatment chosen for the present study.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 70%
“…It should be mentioned that the observed increase in the hippocampus was more robust as compared to the rest of the regions studied. These alterations in dopaminergic activity cannot be attributed to the last administration of WIN 55,212-2 since this dose was delivered 24 h earlier and the drug action has been eliminated according to our unpublished behavioural observations and related findings by Petitet et al (1999).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Our data showed that WIN 55,212-2 was not able to affect the serum TSH levels at any of the analyzed time-points (30 min, 1 h, 2 h, 4 h); however, we cannot exclude the possibility that a decrease in TSH levels could occur later than 4 h after WIN 55,212-2 administration. The fact that in a previous study D 9 THC was able to decrease TSH levels very rapidly (1) shows that D 9 THC and WIN 55,212-2, having different pharmacokinetic and metabolic profiles (8,23,24), can act on the pituitary CB1 receptors with divergent mechanisms of action.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%