2007
DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.0732-07.2007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cannabinoids Excite Hypothalamic Melanin-Concentrating Hormone But Inhibit Hypocretin/Orexin Neurons: Implications for Cannabinoid Actions on Food Intake and Cognitive Arousal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

10
79
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
10
79
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In line with body weight changes, there was a significant effect of time (baseline and day 26 of treatment) on fat mass (F (1,19) ¼ 8.54, P ¼ 0.009) and a strong interaction between treatment group and time (F (1,19) ¼ 32.51, P < 0.001) though the between-group effects on fat mass did not reach a statistically significant level (F (1,19) ¼ 0.99, P ¼ 0.331) again showing that fat mass had declined in the treatment group over time but not in the controls ( Figure 1C). After 26 days of MCHR1 antagonist treatment there was a significant decrease in fat mass (Paired t test: t ¼ 5.43, df ¼ 9, P < 0.001) whereas vehicle-treated mice showed no significant change in fat mass (Paired t test: t ¼ -2.23, df ¼ 10, P ¼ 0.05).…”
Section: Body Mass and Fatnessmentioning
confidence: 73%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In line with body weight changes, there was a significant effect of time (baseline and day 26 of treatment) on fat mass (F (1,19) ¼ 8.54, P ¼ 0.009) and a strong interaction between treatment group and time (F (1,19) ¼ 32.51, P < 0.001) though the between-group effects on fat mass did not reach a statistically significant level (F (1,19) ¼ 0.99, P ¼ 0.331) again showing that fat mass had declined in the treatment group over time but not in the controls ( Figure 1C). After 26 days of MCHR1 antagonist treatment there was a significant decrease in fat mass (Paired t test: t ¼ 5.43, df ¼ 9, P < 0.001) whereas vehicle-treated mice showed no significant change in fat mass (Paired t test: t ¼ -2.23, df ¼ 10, P ¼ 0.05).…”
Section: Body Mass and Fatnessmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…There were no significant differences between vehicle-treated and MCHR1 antagonist-treated groups in glucose tolerance (F (1,19) ¼ 0.36, P ¼ 0.558, Figure 2A). However, age-matched non-DIO mice that were fed with a regular diet exhibited a better tolerance to glucose, suggesting that HFD impaired glucose metabolism (Figure 2A).…”
Section: Glucose Tolerance and Plasma Metabolitesmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…27 Owing to its localization on inhibitory and excitatory presynaptic terminals, retrograde activation of CB 1 receptors can regulate the release and/or signaling of several neurotransmitters and neuropeptides, including DA, 30 MCH and orexin. 31 Recent findings of Cristino and Di Marzo show that orexin neurons express a biosynthetic enzyme for 2-arachidonoylglycerol and show that CB 1 receptors are localized on GABAergic fibers that surround orexin neurons (see Matias et al 32 ). These authors also observe that orexin-1 and CB 1 receptors are highly colocalized in the hypothalamus, 32 whereas others have shown that CB 1 activation can sensitize orexin-1 receptors expressed in the same cell through receptor-receptor functional interactions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%