2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.trac.2022.116554
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cannabis sativa bioactive compounds and their extraction, separation, purification, and identification technologies: An updated review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
54
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 97 publications
0
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To overcome these limitations that are characteristic of the 1D spectra of complex mixtures, the identification of the various cannabinoids present in the extracts (CBD, CBDA, CBG, THC) was carried out using the 2D correlation experiments 1 H COSY, 1 H- 13 C HMQC, and 1 H J -Res and the data reported in the literature regarding the NMR characterizations of many single isolated cannabinoids [ 40 , 41 , 42 ]. It is worth underlining that, even in recent papers [ 35 , 36 , 57 ], the NMR methodology is mostly used to characterize fractions or single components of C. sativa obtained by separation techniques. In Figure 6 , 1 H COSY and 1 H- 13 C HMQC spectra are shown together with the corresponding enlargement on the CBD and CBDA correlations taken as an example of the metabolic identification procedure adopted.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To overcome these limitations that are characteristic of the 1D spectra of complex mixtures, the identification of the various cannabinoids present in the extracts (CBD, CBDA, CBG, THC) was carried out using the 2D correlation experiments 1 H COSY, 1 H- 13 C HMQC, and 1 H J -Res and the data reported in the literature regarding the NMR characterizations of many single isolated cannabinoids [ 40 , 41 , 42 ]. It is worth underlining that, even in recent papers [ 35 , 36 , 57 ], the NMR methodology is mostly used to characterize fractions or single components of C. sativa obtained by separation techniques. In Figure 6 , 1 H COSY and 1 H- 13 C HMQC spectra are shown together with the corresponding enlargement on the CBD and CBDA correlations taken as an example of the metabolic identification procedure adopted.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, a quantitative analysis with gas chromatography (GC) using the flame ionization detector (FID) method was conducted on samples of the Tiborszallasi variety prepared from the same dried inflorescence matrix as the NMR samples by following the protocol reported in the literature [ 29 ]. It should be emphasized that, given the chemical complexity of C. sativa , the extraction and collection of its various bioactive compounds are not simple and, for this reason, both solvents and different extraction methods are reported in the literature, ranging from microwave-assisted extraction to supercritical fluid extraction [ 36 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Madaka et al [49] reported the purification of this class of compounds from Cannabis sativa L. The use of supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) and flash chromatography in the RevelerisPREP purification system led to the isolation and purification of three cannabinoids including CBD, CBN, and THC with a high purity. Recently, Liu et al [50] reported an extensive review of various advanced technologies for extracting, separating, purifying, and identifying the bioactive compounds in Cannabis sativa. The separation and purification of phytochemicals from this plant have been reported using solid-phase extraction (SPE), centrifugal partition chromatography (CPC), preparative high-performance liquid chromatography ( prep-HPLC), and hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography (HILIC).…”
Section: Topsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it has several drawbacks, such as consuming a long time, wasting a large number of solvents and energy, using toxic solvents, and degrading thermally unstable compounds [ 17 , 18 ]. Therefore, several green and novel techniques, such as ultrasound-assisted extraction (UAE), microwave-assisted extraction (MAE), enzyme-assisted extraction (EAE), deep eutectic solvent extraction, and supercritical fluid extraction, have been developed for extracting bioactive compounds from plants [ 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 ]. Among these techniques, UAE shows the advantages in time and energy savings, toxic organic solvent reduction, and easy operation [ 23 , 24 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%