2002
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.88.229702
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cannonet al.Reply:

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

7
53
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
7
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several models, which are based on the suppression of the turbulence [3][4][5], the electric field bifurcation [6][7], the steep gradient of the electric field [8], the effect of ripple loss [9], and others, have been pointed out. The observations of these models also have been reported in many tokamak and helical/stellarator plasmas [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22]. Nevertheless, there are still open questions about these nonlinear phenomena.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Several models, which are based on the suppression of the turbulence [3][4][5], the electric field bifurcation [6][7], the steep gradient of the electric field [8], the effect of ripple loss [9], and others, have been pointed out. The observations of these models also have been reported in many tokamak and helical/stellarator plasmas [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22]. Nevertheless, there are still open questions about these nonlinear phenomena.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…It has been shown that entangled qudits are less affected by noise than entangled qubits. [1,2] In quantum cryptography it is more secure against evesdropping attacks using entangled qutrits or qudits than using qubits. [3−6] These facts motivate our interest in multidimensional entangled states.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here we use the CGLMP expression introduced in Ref. [21] in our research. For the sake of convenience, we reform the original CGLMP expression 𝐼 𝑑 by letting 𝐴 𝑖 → −𝐴 𝑖 (𝑖 = 1 and 2) and 𝐵 1 ↔ 𝐵 2 , i.e.,…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%