1985
DOI: 10.1093/biomet/72.2.241
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Canonical and principal components of shape

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
162
0
4

Year Published

1996
1996
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 435 publications
(167 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
162
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…As a general rule, its only efficacy as a generalised size metric is that it effectively approximates a generalised size vector in multivariate (n-dimensional) space which is ultimately testable. [38][39][40][41] As Jolicoeur and Mosimann have demonstrated, [38][39][40][41]51 both principal and canonical components can be derived and assessed in lieu of any generalised multivariate size distribution (conforming to the Guassian log-normal and gamma distributions) and these effectively approximate the geometric mean. Nevertheless, there has been some recent criticism of the utility of the geometric mean.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…As a general rule, its only efficacy as a generalised size metric is that it effectively approximates a generalised size vector in multivariate (n-dimensional) space which is ultimately testable. [38][39][40][41] As Jolicoeur and Mosimann have demonstrated, [38][39][40][41]51 both principal and canonical components can be derived and assessed in lieu of any generalised multivariate size distribution (conforming to the Guassian log-normal and gamma distributions) and these effectively approximate the geometric mean. Nevertheless, there has been some recent criticism of the utility of the geometric mean.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While this is important, it merely stresses the rationale (theoretical/computational) that bivariate linear regression of any dependent k variate upon a geometric mean in a cumulative series of which it is a constituent, is inappropriate. 38,45,51 Irrespective of scalar constraints (i.e. differential size of the k dependents), any series of k variates is presumed to be highly correlated with its geometric mean and, given the computational mechanics of derivation of the least squares regression slope, the assumption of independence of x and y is effectively violated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Especially, given that normal assumptions are usually not "fatal". The resultant significance tests may still be reliable (Darroch & Mosimann, 1985).…”
Section: Discriminant Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%