2009
DOI: 10.1016/s0034-4877(09)90020-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Canonical quantization of motion on submanifolds

Abstract: This is an extended version of the talk given by the Author at the 40th Symposium on Mathematical Physics held in Torun, Poland, June 25-28, 2008. We review the methods of canonical quantization of free particle motion on curved submanifolds considered as a system with second class constraints. The work is based on our previous articles, [1] and [2]. However, some new results are also presented.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The following is a list of various forms of the GM in the current literature. Because (6)- (8) give the most general GM of p (α,β)i satisfying the fundamental commutators (20 ) (v) The fifth choice is made by many groups based on different theoretical grounds and it should be α = 1 and β = 0 13,17,[19][20][21][22][23]30 .…”
Section: Geometric Momenta For a Particle On The Sphere: A Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The following is a list of various forms of the GM in the current literature. Because (6)- (8) give the most general GM of p (α,β)i satisfying the fundamental commutators (20 ) (v) The fifth choice is made by many groups based on different theoretical grounds and it should be α = 1 and β = 0 13,17,[19][20][21][22][23]30 .…”
Section: Geometric Momenta For a Particle On The Sphere: A Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The terms on the right-hand sides of these equations must be all zero; otherwise, relation (23) as [x i , H] = i p (α,β)i /µ will be violated. The only solution is simply…”
Section: Complete Determination Of Geometric Momenta and The Hammentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2) shows that in general the curvature coefficients, λ 1 and λ 2 , depend on the details of the confining forces [24], i.e., their values cannot be determined from first principle. Viewing the system as a second-class constrained system and employing Dirac's quantization program for such systems leads to the same conclusion; the Hamiltonian has the form (2), but the curvature coefficients cannot be uniquely determined from theoretical considerations [25]. These observations provide further motivation for the empirical determination of the curvature coefficients by performing scattering experiments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Note that in these calculations (23), (24) and (25) where the constraints are of second-class, we need to deal with H instead of H p for we have,ḟ…”
Section: Dirac's Theory For Systems Of Second-class Constraintsmentioning
confidence: 99%