1998
DOI: 10.1023/b:joss.0000033152.73539.a2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Canonical versus Grand-Canonical Free Energies and Phase Diagrams of a Bipolaronic Superconductor Model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Notice that the results of Section 2.1 together with results of [13,32,37,[43][44][45][46] give the full picture of behavior of model (1) for U ≤ 0, W = 0, and J z , J xy = 0 within VA approach. Cases of U > 0 as well as J z , J xy = 0 are left to future works.…”
Section: Summary and Final Commentsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Notice that the results of Section 2.1 together with results of [13,32,37,[43][44][45][46] give the full picture of behavior of model (1) for U ≤ 0, W = 0, and J z , J xy = 0 within VA approach. Cases of U > 0 as well as J z , J xy = 0 are left to future works.…”
Section: Summary and Final Commentsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…of an FCC-lattice with r = 4, Fig. 2.1 [23]) or lattice dependent symmetrizations of Hubbard models (r = 2) [24,60], which are discussed in connection with models of bipolaronic interactions [61,62], for high-T c superconductors [63].…”
Section: Remarks On Model Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this, the techniques from [10], [47], [48], [49], [50], [51], where the homogeneous mean-field theory is perturbed with certain classes of momentum dependent inhomogeneities, would apply.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%