2014
DOI: 10.4236/ajps.2014.520320
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Canopy Storage Implications on Interception Loss Modeling

Abstract: A rainfall interception methodology was implemented in a deciduousFicus benjamina (L.) tree to evaluate the interception loss, as well as the dynamics on canopy storage capacity (S) and free through fall (ρ). Measurements of gross precipitation (P g ), through fall and meteorological data were recorded every 5 minutes. Nineteen individual storms from summer to autumn 2005, and twenty one in spring to autumn, 2006 were analyzed. For the studied period, 151.59 mm and 203.35 mm of rainfall occurred on 2005 and 20… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 7 shows that the Gash method is the most stable between the two trees and among seasons (R 2 = 60 % ± 2 %, E RMS = 0.85 ± 0.2 mm), whereas the other methods show more variation. As reported by Véliz-Chávez et al (2014), the performance of the Rutter model is not as good as the performance of the Gash method. Similarly, we also observe an underestimation of the interception storage for higher rainfall events (P g > 10 mm) using the Rutter method (Fig.…”
Section: The Interception Storage Capacity and Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Table 7 shows that the Gash method is the most stable between the two trees and among seasons (R 2 = 60 % ± 2 %, E RMS = 0.85 ± 0.2 mm), whereas the other methods show more variation. As reported by Véliz-Chávez et al (2014), the performance of the Rutter model is not as good as the performance of the Gash method. Similarly, we also observe an underestimation of the interception storage for higher rainfall events (P g > 10 mm) using the Rutter method (Fig.…”
Section: The Interception Storage Capacity and Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Furthermore, throughfall is usually not equally distributed under the canopy, which makes upscaling results to the whole tree canopy level difficult. Another in situ measurement method is the collection of all throughfall under a tree via the construction of a v-catchment construction large enough to cover the canopy area (Véliz-Chávez et al, 2014;Xiao et al, 2000b). Throughfall and stemflow are usually collected in separate containers.…”
Section: Measurement Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Direct method need less period but it also needs special instrumentation, hence it costs more [4]. Rainfall intensity, duration of the storm and temporal and spatial variability of trees are few factors that influence canopy storage capacity [6] The objective of this paper was to study the canopy storage capacity for Scindapsus Aureus. Other objective was to investigate the effect of different rainfall intensity on canopy storage capacity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%