1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0026-2714(98)00118-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cantilever influence suppression of contactless IC-testing by electric force microscopy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In figure 10 this effect can clearly be seen at high tip-sample distance in the amplitude image, because the change of the capacity gradient between tip and sample is much higher in relation to the lever. The interaction below the tip becomes dominant at smaller distances, while the interaction with the lever remains nearly constant [26] (the scale of the amplitude images have been differently adjusted to enhance the contrast).…”
Section: Electron-beam-induced Potentialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In figure 10 this effect can clearly be seen at high tip-sample distance in the amplitude image, because the change of the capacity gradient between tip and sample is much higher in relation to the lever. The interaction below the tip becomes dominant at smaller distances, while the interaction with the lever remains nearly constant [26] (the scale of the amplitude images have been differently adjusted to enhance the contrast).…”
Section: Electron-beam-induced Potentialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In high-vacuum mode such investigations are not possible due to the unstable imaging conditions. The typical cantilever influence can be seen in the line analysis, which can be compensated for by measurements at different heights [26].…”
Section: Electron-beam-induced Potentialsmentioning
confidence: 99%