Conserving Cultural Heritage 2018
DOI: 10.1201/9781315158648-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Canvas consolidation survey and treatment requirements for the NANORESTART project

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The original list of criteria selected for the evaluation of treatments for canvas consolidation included: acceptability to conservators (texture, handling, appearance); high stiffness; negligible hygroscopicity; resistance to creep and stress relaxation, durability; reversibility; low extensibility; good elastic recovery; good adhesion to chosen grounds; low cost; availability and ease-of-use to treat paintings of a large format. In 2015, an online survey of 67 conservators [5] conducted as part of the Nanorestart European project 1 concluded that the current expectations and requirements of conservators for the developments of new consolidants for painting canvases had not changed since the 1970s. Those interviewed agreed that the essential criteria in choosing a consolidation product ought to be canvas strengthening, resilience to aging, and reversibility.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The original list of criteria selected for the evaluation of treatments for canvas consolidation included: acceptability to conservators (texture, handling, appearance); high stiffness; negligible hygroscopicity; resistance to creep and stress relaxation, durability; reversibility; low extensibility; good elastic recovery; good adhesion to chosen grounds; low cost; availability and ease-of-use to treat paintings of a large format. In 2015, an online survey of 67 conservators [5] conducted as part of the Nanorestart European project 1 concluded that the current expectations and requirements of conservators for the developments of new consolidants for painting canvases had not changed since the 1970s. Those interviewed agreed that the essential criteria in choosing a consolidation product ought to be canvas strengthening, resilience to aging, and reversibility.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such an approach would be very welcome by the conservation community. 9 For the last 15 years, NC has been widely studied as a material for reinforcing paper owing to its mechanical, 10,11 optical, 12 and barrier properties, 13 as well as to its tunability through functionalization. 14,15 It is expected that its use will grow significantly due to an increased demand for sustainability.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using nanocellulose as a consolidant could be a way to reinforce weak canvases by providing a solution more compatible with the painting’s cellulose-based support and could also possibly help avoid a lining. Such an approach would be very welcome by the conservation community . For the last 15 years, NC has been widely studied as a material for reinforcing paper owing to its mechanical, , optical, and barrier properties, as well as to its tunability through functionalization. , It is expected that its use will grow significantly due to an increased demand for sustainability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%