2010
DOI: 10.1016/s1001-6279(10)60036-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Capacitive sensing technique for silt suspended sediment concentration monitoring

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A variation of 0.1°C in water temperature may change SSC measurements as high as 800 mg/l. Hsu et al [36] found the errors in measuring SSC between 0.26% and 2.91% for the range of SSC 0-200 g/l in controlled laboratory experiments. These measurements depend on the salinity of water and the presence of air bubbles, algae and thrash in the sediment-laden water [17].…”
Section: Electrical Properties-based Cmtmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A variation of 0.1°C in water temperature may change SSC measurements as high as 800 mg/l. Hsu et al [36] found the errors in measuring SSC between 0.26% and 2.91% for the range of SSC 0-200 g/l in controlled laboratory experiments. These measurements depend on the salinity of water and the presence of air bubbles, algae and thrash in the sediment-laden water [17].…”
Section: Electrical Properties-based Cmtmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(a) To measure the change in apparent dielectric constant directly [17] and (b) To measure the change in capacitance and use it to find SSC through a pre-established empirical relation [36].…”
Section: Electrical Properties-based Cmtmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…weighing method cannot accurately reflect the real conditions. In addition, the measuring process is timeconsuming and labor-intensive, which is a barrier to real-time measuring of the HSSC in the Yellow River.Currently, there are many modern methods for measuring HSSC worldwide which include turbidity, optical transmission, acoustic, capacitive, beam reflectance, laser diffraction, nuclear, and spectral reflectance [1,3,4,[6][7][8]11]. However, these methods are subjected to the following limitations, at least one of them: (1) small measurement range [1]; (2) strong particle-size dependency [5]; (3) too expensive and delicate instruments in fluvial environment; (4) vulnerable to environmental factors such as temperature, flow velocity and so on [10].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%