2004
DOI: 10.1023/b:pnet.0000033978.22198.6f
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Capacity Efficiency and Restorability of Path Protection and Rerouting in WDM Networks Subject to Dual Failures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
36
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
36
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The basic idea of SPR is to reprovision new backups for connections that become unprotected or vulnerable for the next possible failure, due to losing the primary or the backup in the first failure or due to backup resource sharing. Therefore, for multi-link failures SPR has better survivable performance than previous algorithms in [1][2][3][4][5]. However, in our study we also find the drawback of SRP presented as follows.…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 56%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The basic idea of SPR is to reprovision new backups for connections that become unprotected or vulnerable for the next possible failure, due to losing the primary or the backup in the first failure or due to backup resource sharing. Therefore, for multi-link failures SPR has better survivable performance than previous algorithms in [1][2][3][4][5]. However, in our study we also find the drawback of SRP presented as follows.…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 56%
“…Step 12: Adjust the costs of all links according to (3). Run Dijsktra's algorithm to compute the least-cost routes from the source node to all other nodes.…”
Section: Process Of Smrmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recently, several studies have discussed the multi-fault restoration issue [3,9,19,11,20,27]. For example, in [3], the authors considered three problems, namely dual-failure minimum capacity (DFMC), dual-failure maximum restorability (DFMR), and multi-restorability capacity placement (MRCP).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies [3], [6] considered the effect of releasing stub capacity, showing that stub-release can increase the capacity efficiency; the actual benefit is however dependent on the studied network scenario. In these studies, only span resources are considered during the stub-release process, and they do not address the challenge of making highly scarce and needed nodal resources, such as WCs, widely available for the restoration process.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%