2020
DOI: 10.1139/cjce-2018-0796
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Capacity estimation of unsignalized intersections under heterogeneous traffic conditions

Abstract: Capacity of movements at unsignalized intersections are usually estimated based on gap acceptance theory and accuracy of such estimation largely depends on the extent to which its inherent assumptions are satisfied. However, owing to the typical traffic operations at intersections in developing countries, many of these assumptions remain unsatisfied and hence, estimating capacity as per the procedure laid down in the capacity manuals of developed countries will prove inaccurate. The present research focuses on… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to its simple application, several authors have used the Raff method to estimate the critical gap for homogenous and heterogeneous traffic conditions. The cumulative sum of the accepted and the rejected gap equals 1 [22]. However, the limitation of this method is that it does not consider the lag data.…”
Section: Raff's Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to its simple application, several authors have used the Raff method to estimate the critical gap for homogenous and heterogeneous traffic conditions. The cumulative sum of the accepted and the rejected gap equals 1 [22]. However, the limitation of this method is that it does not consider the lag data.…”
Section: Raff's Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A scatter plot was drawn in MATLAB between field capacity values and the corresponding conflicting flow values. As in some cases, there were significant variations in the values of field capacity, which is quite common in the field measurements [55]. The variations in the data were reducing through a smoothening technique that was based on the moving average method (labelled as Field Qm on Figures 2-6).…”
Section: Wu's Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to determine which of the listed methods provides the most realistic estimate of critical headway, the measured field capacity values (labelled as Field Q on Figures 2-6) were compared with capacity values obtained on the basis of critical headway estimated by different methods. Conflicting flow rate (labelled as CF on Figures 2-6) and capacity were measured in the field using the procedures prescribed in [54,55]. When determining these two parameters, queues of at least three vehicles were only considered.…”
Section: Wu's Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additive conflict flow technique The gap acceptance procedure is the theoretical basis for analyzing unsignalized intersections. Some researchers modified existing capacity models to account for the effect of mixed traffic scenarios prevailing in developing countries (Prasetijo, Pour and Ghadiri, 2011;Prasetijo and Ahmad, 2012;Prasetijo et al, 2014Prasetijo et al, , 2016Mohan and Chandra, 2020a). But all of these methods are suitable only for right-angled intersections.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%