“…Regrettably, the technique had some disadvantages that threw a shadow of doubts on its success rate in the long-term, because the sample of the study was very small and the amount of lingual mucosa involved in the stitches was smaller than the recorded required minimal amount ( Bademkiran et al., 2006 ; Ducharme et al., 2017 ; Kersjes et al., 1984 ; McCormack, 1976 ; Yong et al., 2008 ), and this may, theoretically, allow the animals to continue suckling themselves after surgery, controversial to the observed short-term high success rate in the study. In addition, the technique associated with excessive swelling of the ventral lingual aspect for few days post- surgery, excessive scar formation, and the stitches buried and may be left permanently in the tongue, that might lower the animal's score in markets, and above all of this, neither the idea of using silk material in a wet environment like oral cavity nor the permanent existence of silk materials in the tongue is acceptable by some specialists of oral surgery ( Silver et al., 2016 ) as leaving such braided multifilament suture material, of high capillary ascension, in tissues for long time, increases the potential risk of bacterial transport through it ( Geiger et al., 2005 ), and predisposes the tongue to glossitis or abscess formation.…”