1993
DOI: 10.1016/0021-9673(93)80470-s
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Capillary electrophoretic protein separations in polyacrylamide-coated silica capillaries and buffers containing ionic surfactants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
1

Year Published

1995
1995
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
18
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Buffers, therefore, must be carefully optimized in order to successfully separate proteins using MEKC. The selectivity of MEKC-based protein separations depends on the hydrophobic and electrostatic forces between the micelles and the surface of the protein [26,27]. These forces can be modified by varying the pH, ionic strength, and surfactant concentration to optimize the separation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Buffers, therefore, must be carefully optimized in order to successfully separate proteins using MEKC. The selectivity of MEKC-based protein separations depends on the hydrophobic and electrostatic forces between the micelles and the surface of the protein [26,27]. These forces can be modified by varying the pH, ionic strength, and surfactant concentration to optimize the separation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MEKC, introduced in 1984 by Terabe et al [24], has been used primarily for small-molecule analysis [25], although it has also been used for the analysis of macromolecules such as proteins [26][27][28][29][30][31][32]. Successful protein separations using MEKC, however, can be tricky as completely denatured proteins tend to adsorb a constant amount of SDS regardless of the acid-base chemistry or the hydrophobicity of the protein [33].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparing protein peak efficiencies produced by the different capillary coatings investigated in this study, the highest peak efficiencies were obtained in the PHEAcoated capillary indicating minimal interactions between proteins and the polymer coating. The slower migration times and lower efficiencies obtained in LPA-coated capillaries are most likely due to weak interactions, primarily hydrogen bonding between proteins and LPA [42,43]. Reversible hydrogen bonding interactions between proteins and hydrophilic polymer coatings temporarily retain the proteins at the capillary surface, resulting in retardation of the analyte and in band broadening, similar to what happens in chromatographic separations.…”
Section: Protein-polymer Coating Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…To date only a few specific proteins or peptides were investigated [98][99][100][101][102]106], although this technique permits the analysis of several hundred polypeptides simultaneously in a short time, in a small volume, with high sensitivity [103]. Thus, CE-ESI-MS is a powerful alternative to common proteomic technologies.…”
Section: Ce-msmentioning
confidence: 99%