2017
DOI: 10.1007/s00199-017-1070-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Capital accumulation and the welfare gains from trade

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Alessandria and Choi (2014a) show that the recent growth of U.S. manufacturing can be accounted for in models with dynamic export decision. Finally, Alessandria and Choi (2014b), Alessandria et al (2014), and Brooks and Pujolas (2018) show that the gains from trade that arise after a trade liberalization are larger when dynamics are taken into account.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Alessandria and Choi (2014a) show that the recent growth of U.S. manufacturing can be accounted for in models with dynamic export decision. Finally, Alessandria and Choi (2014b), Alessandria et al (2014), and Brooks and Pujolas (2018) show that the gains from trade that arise after a trade liberalization are larger when dynamics are taken into account.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Recently, there have been a few papers computing gains from trade in dynamic models, e.g., Anderson, Larch, and Yotov (2020), Brooks and Pujolas (2018), Alvarez (2017), Ravikumar, Santacreu, and Sposi (2019), Mix (2020), and Alessandria, Choi, and Ruhl (2021). In this article, we decompose the dynamic gains from trade into gains from capital accumulation versus gains due to total factor productivity (TFP) changes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, a number of other recent studies have analyzed the macroeconomic effects of trade policy reforms and other shocks in dynamic, open‐economy models with adjustment frictions on investment (Bajona and Kehoe , Brooks and Pujolas , Ravikumar et al. , Eaton et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%