2020
DOI: 10.1108/mf-05-2020-0238
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Capital budgeting practices: evidence from Korea

Abstract: PurposeThe authors present the results of a survey on how Korean firms evaluate new projects and estimate their capital costs. The authors report how Korean firms’ capital budgeting practices compare to other developed countries and to best practices in the field of finance.Design/methodology/approachThe authors survey CFOs of major Korean firms on their capital budgeting practices. The authors then compare the results against the US and European firms and best practices of leading firms and financial advisors… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(58 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Capital budgeting was evaluated using a longitudinal survey by Graham & Sathye, 2020;Kim et al, 2021). He sees an upward trend in the use of discounted cash flow methods.…”
Section: Contingency Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Capital budgeting was evaluated using a longitudinal survey by Graham & Sathye, 2020;Kim et al, 2021). He sees an upward trend in the use of discounted cash flow methods.…”
Section: Contingency Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Capital budgeting (CB) practices have been widely studied, with the literature concentrating on identifying companies' most commonly applied capital budgeting indicators and reasons for using some rather than others. Most studies are based on large listed companies in big countries with developed economies, such as the USA (e.g., Graham and Harvey 2001), the UK, Germany, the Netherlands, France, Sweden, Italy, Spain (e.g., Brounen et al 2004;Daunfeldt and Hartwig 2014;Rossi 2014), Brazil (e.g., de Souza and Lunkes 2016), Canada (e.g., Bennouna et al 2010), Australia (e.g., Truong et al 2008), and Korea (e.g., Kim et al 2021). There are also studies in other countries such as Croatia (e.g., Dedi and Orsag 2008), Sri Lanka (e.g., Nurullah and Kengatharan 2015), Kuwait (e.g., AlKulaib et al 2016), Barbados (e.g., Alleyne et al 2018), andPortugal (e.g., João et al 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…used techniques (Kim, Lee, Park, & Waggle, 2021;Siziba & Hall, 2021). Literature review shows that larger organizations have more resources at their disposal and have more sophisticated capital budgeting techniques than smaller ones that are less likely to use the considered "best practices" (Batra & Verma, 2017;Chittenden & Derregia, 2015;Kim et al, 2021;Nawaiseh, Al-nawaiseh, Attar, & Al-nidawy, 2018;Tresierra-Tanaka & Vega-Acuña, 2019).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…used techniques (Kim, Lee, Park, & Waggle, 2021;Siziba & Hall, 2021). Literature review shows that larger organizations have more resources at their disposal and have more sophisticated capital budgeting techniques than smaller ones that are less likely to use the considered "best practices" (Batra & Verma, 2017;Chittenden & Derregia, 2015;Kim et al, 2021;Nawaiseh, Al-nawaiseh, Attar, & Al-nidawy, 2018;Tresierra-Tanaka & Vega-Acuña, 2019). Lack of time, non-information, or excessive confidence about having precise human capital without knowledge and skills conspire against small businesses to apply 'rules of thumb' in capital budgeting and the most convenient decision to accept or reject an investment project (Elgebeily et al, 2021;Jiang & Hu, 2021;Tresierra-Tanaka & Vega-Acuña, 2019).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation