2004
DOI: 10.1016/s1045-2354(02)00214-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Capitalism, states and ac-counting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
44
0
4

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
3
44
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Far from being abandoned it was assaulted by waves of management, auditing, reporting, and political exhortation. New management systems, targets, assessments, and rankings marked extreme government intervention in the public sector (Catchpowle et al, 2004;Cutler and Waine, 2000;Dunleavy and Hood, 1994;Humphrey et al 1993;Lawrence and Sharma, 2002;van Thiel and Leeuw, 2002). Far from dismantling the public sector as earlier analysis often predicted, neo-liberalism has been extremely interested in the public sector and in the state in general.…”
Section: Neo-liberalism and Interventionismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Far from being abandoned it was assaulted by waves of management, auditing, reporting, and political exhortation. New management systems, targets, assessments, and rankings marked extreme government intervention in the public sector (Catchpowle et al, 2004;Cutler and Waine, 2000;Dunleavy and Hood, 1994;Humphrey et al 1993;Lawrence and Sharma, 2002;van Thiel and Leeuw, 2002). Far from dismantling the public sector as earlier analysis often predicted, neo-liberalism has been extremely interested in the public sector and in the state in general.…”
Section: Neo-liberalism and Interventionismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These assumptions include a general privileging of capital and profit over labour and the environment (drawing, for example, on Tinker, 1985;Catchpowle, Cooper & Wright, 2004;Ravenscroft & Williams, 2004;Gray, 2006). Exposing and exploring these assumptions, including their mutability, allows students to see the manner in which accounting is defined, constructed and practised to shape and create particular social realities.…”
Section: Social Constructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This introduced the broad notion that, although accounting may contain many possibilities for emancipatory practice, it tends to produce one-sided constructions of reality that serve and legitimise narrow, particular social and economic interests (Tinker, 1985;Richardson, 1987;Tinker, 1991;Chua, 1996;Catchpowle et al 2004). Students were exposed not only to the role of accounting as part of the "fundamental relationship between political and economic forces in society" (Miller, 1994, p.9), but also to how accounting calculative devices operate to shape and form the possibilities for action.…”
Section: Accounting and Powermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, those critical researchers choosing to operate within the Marxist tradition, such as myself, will continue to hold on to the tenet that the writings of Marx, Engels, Lenin, Trotsky, Stalin, and Mao have correctly identified the source and agent of exploitation. The primary source of exploitation is the capitalist production process (Callinicos, 2006;Kenway, 2008), where surplus-value or, in other words, unpaid labour time (Bryer, 1994(Bryer, , 1995(Bryer, , 1999(Bryer, , 2006Catchpowle et al, 2004Catchpowle et al, , p. 1040Marx, 1976, Chap. 7, pp.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 I think that Žižek (2008, p. 189) is correct in saying that when Mao stated, in a mocking spirit, that victory by the Red Army over its enemies amounted to (dialectical) synthesis what is precisely wrong here is Mao"s mocking attitude. The Red Army is not above or outside history nor is it above or outside dialectics (Catchpowle et al, 2004(Catchpowle et al, , p. 1047 Revolutionary Marxists … regard racism as a product of capitalism which serves to reproduce this social system by dividing the working class; it can be abolished, therefore, only through a socialist revolution achieved by a united working class, one in which blacks and whites join together against their common [class] exploiter.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%